The meeting was called to order at 6:00 p.m. by President James.  It was noted that all Board members were present with the exception of Trustee Prola.

There was no Public Testimony on Closed Session items.

The Board recessed into Closed Session at 6:01 p.m.

The Board reconvened to Open Session at 7:05 p.m.  It was noted that Trustee Prola arrived as the Board was going into Closed Session. 

President James led the Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag.

Members of the audience who wish to address the Board are asked to complete the yellow card available at the entrance and submit it to the Board's Administrative Assistant. Speakers who have completed the card will be called when the item is reached on the agenda or, for non-agenda items, during the Public Testimony. Cards are to be turned in before the item is reached on the agenda. Please note that the meeting is being recorded.

State law prohibits the Board of Education from taking any action on or discussing items that are not on the posted agenda except to A) briefly respond to statements made or questions posed by the public in attendance; B) ask questions for clarification; C) provide a reference to a staff member or other resource for factual information in response to the inquiry; or D) ask a staff member to report back on the matter at the next meeting and/or put it on a future agenda. (Government Code 54954.2(a)).

There was no Public Testimony on Non-Agenda Items.

Victoria Forrester, Director of Special Education, Student Support and Community Wellness presented the District's plan to commission a Special Education Task Force. The San Leandro School District received a comprehensive report on the status of the Special Education Program by the Fiscal Crisis Management and Assistance Team (FCMAT) at the April 22, 2014, School Board meeting. 

Upon review of the report, District leadership requested that Strategic Consultation for Schools develop a proposal of support and consultation to address the recommendations identified in the FCMAT report. One key aspect of the proposal for addressing the recommendations is the formation of a Special Education Task Force. 

According to Ms. Forrester, the goal of the Task Force will be to analyze the current status of programs for students with special needs within the District, research exemplary program service delivery models currently in use throughout California and the nation, and generate a Special Education Strategic Plan. The plan will outline the key service priorities necessary to produce a high quality, fiscally responsible special education program. The Special Education Task Force will be comprised of representatives from all constituency groups including students, parents, teachers, and administrators.

It is estimated that there will be a 24-month timeline to do this critically important work, with plans to present the Special Education Strategic Plan for Board approval in June 2015.  Steps in developing the plan include:

• Commission the Task Force
• Recruit Task Force members
• Hold 10 work Sessions
• Design the Strategic Plan
• Provide formative reports to Board
• Present final report to Board
• Launch implement of the plan

Ms. Forrester said that in addition to the voice of our high school students, the District also wants middle school students and fifth grade students to provide their voice and best thinking around these issues. 

The Board thanked Ms. Forrester for the presentation, noting that it is good to see the District streamlining the costs and meeting the needs of our students and families who need these services.

Victoria Forrester, Director of Special Education, Student Support and Community Wellness will present the District's plan to commission a Special Education Task Force. The San Leandro School District received a comprehensive report on the status of the Special Education Program by the Fiscal Crisis Management and Assistance Team (FCMAT) at the April 22, 2014, School Board meeting. Upon review of the report, District leadership requested that Strategic Consultation for Schools develop a proposal of support and consultation to address the recommendations identified in the FCMAT report. One key aspect of the proposal for addressing the recommendations is the formation of a Special Education Task Force. The goal of the Task Force will be to analyze the current status of programs for students with special needs within the District, research exemplary program service delivery models currently in use throughout California and the nation, and generate a Special Education Strategic Plan. The Strategic Plan will outline the key service priorities necessary to produce a high quality, fiscally responsible special education program. The Special Education Task Force will be comprised of representatives from all constituency groups including students, parents, teachers, and administrators.

The San Leandro Unified School District is planning the construction of a School Based Health and Wellness Center in partnership with HRSA, City Of San Leandro, Supervisor  Wilma Chan's Office, County of Alameda, Center for Healthy Schools and Communities, and Alameda Health Systems.  Joe Vela of Aedis Architects gave a presentation on the plans for the San Leandro Health and Wellness Center, including the conceptual design development, proposed construction phasing and timelines. The presentation included some artists' renderings of what the interior space may look like, and highlighted versatility in the wellness portion of the 14,000 square-foot building.  The health clinic, which was briefly covered and presented in more depth at an earlier Board meeting, comprises approximately 4,000 square feet. 

The Board thanked Ms. Aedis for the presentation. It was suggested that the District consider naming the building in honor of someone, as was done with the 9th Grade Campus. 

Public Hearing comments are limited to 3 minutes per speaker, subject to adjustment by the Board President.  Members of the audience who wish to address the Board regarding the Public Hearing are asked to complete the yellow card available at the entrance and submit it to the Board's Administrative Assistant. 

PUBLIC HEARING

A public hearing was held regarding the Achievement Peaks STEM Academy Charter petition.

The role of the Board is to hold this public hearing in accordance with Education Code Section 47605(b), ?No later than 30 days after receiving a petition, in accordance with subdivision (a), the governing board of the school district shall hold a public hearing on the provisions of the charter, at which time the governing board of the school district shall consider the level of support for the petition by teachers employed by the district, other employees of the district, and parents. Following review of the petition and the public hearing, the governing board of the school district shall either grant or deny the charter within 60 days of receipt of the petition, provided, however, that the date may be extended by an additional 30 days if both parties agree to the extension.?

The public hearing is to meet the requirements by Education Code Section 47605(b).  The hearing provides the public the opportunity to make an oral or written presentation to the Board regarding the Achievement Peaks STEM Academy Charter petition.

• On a motion made by Trustee Rosato and seconded by Trustee Katz-Lacabe, the Board opened the Public Hearing regarding the Achievement Peaks STEM Academy Charter petition by a 6-0 vote. 
  
  
• There was no Public Testimony
  
  
• On a motion made by Trustee Prola and seconded by Trustee Carey, the Board closed the Public Hearing regarding the Achievement Peaks STEM Academy Charter petition by a 6-0 vote.

Conduct a Public Hearing for Achievement Peaks STEM Academy Charter Petition:

PUBLIC HEARING

A public hearing will be held regarding the Achievement Peaks STEM Academy Charter petition.

The role of the Board is to hold this public hearing in accordance with Education Code Section 47605(b), ?No later than 30 days after receiving a petition, in accordance with subdivision (a), the governing board of the school district shall hold a public hearing on the provisions of the charter, at which time the governing board of the school district shall consider the level of support for the petition by teachers employed by the district, other employees of the district, and parents. Following review of the petition and the public hearing, the governing board of the school district shall either grant or deny the charter within 60 days of receipt of the petition, provided, however, that the date may be extended by an additional 30 days if both parties agree to the extension.?

The public hearing is to meet the requirements by Education Code Section 47605(b).  The hearing provides the public the opportunity to make an oral or written presentation to the Board regarding the Achievement Peaks STEM Academy Charter petition.

1. Board President opens the Public Hearing
   
   Motion              Second              Vote      
   
   
2. Public Testimony
   
   
3. Board President closes the Public Hearing

       Motion              Second              Vote         

Trustee Rosato reported receipt of the following emails from June 24, 2014, to August 7, 2014: From Mary Patterson regarding "Classified Vacancies"; from Zachary Kahn regarding "Gay Pride Parade This Sunday"; from Laura Aguayo-Guevara regarding Certification Job Vacancy"; from Sheila Jordan regarding "Please Join Us for the Annual Board of Education Reorganization Meeting"; from Mary Patterson regarding "Classified Reposting"; from Mary Patterson regarding "Vacancy Classified Management"; from "Rosanna Mucetti regarding "Board Policy and Board Curriculum Committee Meeting"; from Monthly Teacher Newsletter regarding "New School Year Lessons and Worksheets"; from Mary Patterson regarding "Classified Posting," and "P.E. Posting"; from Robin Michel regarding "San Leandro and Pacific HS Reunion August 23"; from Mary Patterson regarding "Classified Vacancies"; from Sukhi Khaira regarding "Facilities and Technology Agenda, August 6, 2014"; from Laura Aguayo-Guevara regarding "Certificated Vacancies"; from Mary Patterson regarding "Classified Vacancies," and "Early Dismissal Calendar."

There were no Union Representative Reports.

Superintendent McLaughlin began by saying that "It is with pleasure, and sadness, to announce, that Associate Song Chin-Bendib will be leaving us to take a position with the Piedmont Unified School District, adding that she has served the District well, noting that "During lean times she has managed over $200 million in school facilities projects.  She will be missed."

The Superintendent reported that last weekend a Leadership Retreat was held for our leaders in Napa. The focus of the Retreat was customer service and how it relates to the District's Strategic Plan, including the "end product", of having San Leandro students graduate ready for career and college, and ensuring future success in life. 

Dr. McLaughlin acknowledged Dr. Rosanna Mucetti and the Educational Services Division for their work on the Teaching & Leaning Conference taking place today, and going through Thursday, August 14, at the Fred T. Korematsu (FTK)campus.  All instructional innovators, district coaches, and administrators were registered to attend, with an additional seventy-five more teachers registered to attend on a first-come, first serve basis.  Participants delved into Project Based Learning with facilitation from the Buck Institute of Education. If any Board members are interested in attending, just let Dr. Mucetti know and she can give you a schedule and you can see some of the exciting workshops that are happening at FTK.

The Superintendent will be sending the Board some dates to coordinate his State of  District Address.  He is looking at the first two weeks in September.

He attended the high school registration, saying that it was exciting to all the energy. Tours of all the campuses are being planned.

Trustee Carey reported that the Curriculum Committee met on July 29, 2014, and discussed the Renaissance Learning Assessment and Analytics Software, which are on the agenda for Board consideration tonight.   

Trustee Prola reported that the Facilities & Technology Committee met on August 6, 2014. The committee received a presentation on the design for the health & wellness center and discussed a Request for Qualifications for a facilities study which will be the basis for a possible Bond measure in 2016. The committee also heard a presentation and discussed the Apple MacBook Pros for teachers, Chromebooks for 4th through 12th grade levels and Ipads for K-3.  Safety measures will be paid for with leftover Measure B funds. 

There was no report.

The following Consent Items were pulled from the Consent Calendar:

• 12c - Contracted Services for Special Education between Easter Seals Bay Area and San Leandro Unified School District (Prola)
• 12g - Bond Contracts $15,000 or Less for Fiscal Year 2014-2015 (Prola)
• 12h - Contracts for Amount $5,000 or Less for Fiscal Year 2014-2015 (Prola)
• 12 j - 2014-2015 Non-Public School/Agency Contract (James for a Speaker Card)
• 12l - Approval of Bill Warrants (Prola)

With that, the Board approved the Consent Calendar as amended, on a motion made Trustee Rosato and seconded by Trustee Carey by a 6-0 vote.

Trustee Prola noted that this contract being brought for Board consideration went into effect on July 1, 2014, without Board pre-approval.  She reminded staff of the process that includes Board approval for expenses before services begin.

With that the Board approved the Contracted Services for Special Education between Easter Seals Bay Area and San Leandro Unified School District.

Trustee Prola noted a $24,016.25 cost for the installation of doors at Garfield was incuded on the Bond Contracts for $15,000 or less spreadsheet. She reminded staff of the importance of placing items in the appropriate section on the agenda.  Trustee Lopez voiced her concerns regarding this topic, along with Trustee Carey who noted that having contracts come to the Board "after the fact" was something that occurred several years ago, and was concerned that this seemed to be reoccurring.  Superintendent McLaughlin explained that staff has been working on placing items on the agenda in the proper category i.e. Consent, Action, etc. and will continue to work on this.

With that the Board approved the Summary Spreadsheet for all Bond Contracts $15,000 or Less per Fiscal Year. 

Trustee Prola reiterated that the purpose of creating spreadsheets that include items under $5,000 or less or $15,000 or less as in the previous item, was to streamline the process of approving each item individually.  With that being said, she noted that the West Alameda County Conference (WACC) contract for $29,890 was included on the Contracts $5,000 of Less per Fiscal Year. 

With that, the Board approved the Summary Spreadsheet for All Contracts $5,000 or Less per Fiscal Year. 

PUBLIC COMMENT

Carol Delton, Special Education teacher, addressed the Board regarding the reporting process of Non-Public School (NPS) and Non-Public Agencies (NPA) to the Board, where they are lumped together. While they have very similar state standards, Ms. Delton noted that the services are very different. She recommended that the services be sorted and listed as NPS services with a subtotal and NPA services with a subtotal, which would make it easier to look at our District's expenditures during the year and whether or not this is the best way of providing the best services that our students need.

Superintendent McLaughlin felt that this item should be included in the Action Item category, which would provide better clarification to the public. 

The Board then approved the 2014-2015 Non-Public School/Agency Contracts.

New non-public school placement and agency contracts for the school year 2014-2015.

Trustee Prola asked for clarification regarding two expenses that occurred on June 2, 2014, (1) to Ghirardelli Chocolate for $1,994.20 and (2) Pacheco Brothers Gardening Inc. for $1,930.00.  Superintendent said that he would research those expenses and get back to her.

The Board then approved the Bill Warrants.

The Board approved the Lease-Leaseback Contract MWLogic, Inc. for the School Based Health Care Center Construction Project.

On February 4, 2014, the Board of Education received a presentation from Philip J. Henderson, Attorney at Law, Orbach Huff Suarez & Henderson LLP, on the Lease-Leaseback (LLB) Construction Project Delivery Method Available per Education Code Section 17406, which the District will use to deliver some of the bond construction projects in 2014. The basic structure of the LLB is as follows:

• District leases real property to a builder for $1 (site lease)
• Builder constructs facility, then leases the facility back to the district?this is the ?leaseback? component (facility lease)
• District makes payments for construction costs:
• Tenant improvement payments during construction
• Lease payments after construction
• The construction terms and conditions are part of an exhibit to the facility lease
• Title to the new facility vests in the district as lease payments are made
• District makes lease payments for a period of time and then has the option to make a balloon payment to the builder to buy out the facilities lease

One of the benefits of using a LLB delivery method is that if a district has had trouble with a contractor, or even a sub-contractor, this method allows more control for who is selected.  A district accepts the Best Value as opposed to the low bidder, and while the LLB is not designed as a cost saving tool, districts can level the cost impact by adding completion. Many districts have found that there are fewer performance issues using this method.

LLB contracts are still school district public work contracts and the builder must pay prevailing wages, a payment bond is required, as well as DSA approval and Field Act compliance. 

The District desires to undertake construction of a School Based Health Care Center.  In accordance with Education Code Section 17406, the governing board of a school district may enter into a contractual arrangement by which a ?person, firm, or corporation? leases the school district?s property, constructs improvements on the property, and leases the improvements back to the school district, and title to the improvements vests in the school district at the end of the lease. This is referred to as the ?lease-leaseback construction delivery method.? The lease-leaseback construction delivery method does not require competitive bidding for the necessary construction work.

On July 1, 2014, the District released a Prequalification Questionnaire for any prospective contractor or firm who intended to submit a Lease-Leaseback contract proposal prequalify prior to submitting a bid.  On July 15, 2014, the District received four qualified bids for the School Based Health Center.  It is staff recommendation that the Board of Education approve use of the lease-leaseback construction delivery method and to approve use of MW Logic, Inc. as the contractor who will complete the School Based Health Care Center Project. Pursuant to the Facilities Lease, the contractor will cause the project to be constructed for One Million Dollars ($1,000,000), Guaranteed Maximum Price.

It is important to note that the Guaranteed Maximum Price Lease-Leaseback contract with MW Logic, Inc., in the amount of $1,000,000 is for the health clinic portion only, and does not include the wellness portion.  Staff will bring back one additional change order for the seismic work and demolition of interior walls for the wellness center portion.

The cost of services is included in funding from the General Obligation School Facilities Bond Measure B, approved by voters in the November 2006 Election, as well as the additional funding  sources:

The Board approved Two MOUs through the Mid Alameda County SELPA with Castro Valley and San Leandro Unified School Districts for Services as Needed for San Leandro USD Special Needs Students for the 2014-15 School year.

PUBLIC COMMENT

Carol Delton, Special Education teacher, addressed the Board on the inaccuracy of the FCMAT report, and the failure of the FCMAT team to incorporate input from Special Education staff into the report. She urged the Board. that if approved, a clause be included reflecting a reduction of costs if hours are not needed. 

Following the comments, the Board agreed that adding a clause reflecting a reduction in the cost, if the hours were not needed, was a good idea; however, raised concerns regarding the lack of having stakeholder input and collaboration, and if it would be possible to take more time to vet the concerns raised by the speaker.

The Superintendent explained that in order for the District to have a collaborative structure, the Board needs to commission a Special Education Task Force, comprised of representatives from all constituency groups including students, parents, teachers, and administrators for the 2014-2015 academic year.  The goals of the Task Force will be to analyze the current status of programs for students with special needs within the District, research exemplary program service delivery models currently in use throughout California and the nation, and generate a Special Education Strategic Plan, which will outline the key service priorities necessary to produce a high quality, fiscally responsible special education program.  

With that, the Board approved the Contract for Services between Strategic Consultation for Schools and the San Leandro Unified School District.

The Board approved the Commissioning of the 2014-2015 Special Education Task Force.

The Board approved the Purchase of Macbook Pros for San Leandro Unified School District Teachers and Administrators.

Responding to Trustee Prola's request to receive a hard copy of the curriculum guides when available, Dr. Mucetti explained that the guides were very large documents, so they have been made available digitally through Google Docs and can be assessed through the Hyper Link included in the Board agenda, which will take you to the virtual document.

The Board approved the Adoption of Common Core State Standards English Language Arts Curriculum Guides, Grades K-12. 

Trustee Katz-Lacabe raised concerns with regards to the implementation of the Common Core Standards, referring to an article he read in the Wall Street Journal recently by a UC-Berkeley math professor who finds Common Core lacking. He asked if staff might provide some comments on how the Common Core Curriculum Standards implementation and material that the District is adopting tonight compares to the existing standards and to the promise of the Common Core Standards.  A brief discussion insured with staff explaining how the Common Core Math Courses have been designed, adding that these courses are built around our new mathematics curriculum guides and have been developed to promote student understanding of conceptual math, mathematical habits of mind, 21st Century Learning Skills, and multiple opportunities and methods for practice towards masters of key concepts. Staff also indicated that the Teaching, Learning, Educational Equity Department is looking at scheduling community nights around Common Core for parents, teachers, and the community, so they can understand the pathway the District is choosing and why.

The Board thanked staff addressing some of the concerns, and is looking forward to updates. 

The Board then approved the Adoption of Common Core State Standards for Mathematics Curriculum Guides and Courses, Grades 6-9. 

Following the vote, the Board took a break at 8:17 p.m. and returned to Open Session at 8:27 p.m.

In response to Trustee Prola, Superintendent McLaughlin explained that this MOU is a short-term agreement between the District, Newark Unified, and the Local Educational Agency for East Bay Induction Consortium (EBBIC).  It is the District's hope of becoming its own consortium in the future. The Superintendent also acknowledged and thanked Assemblymember Bonta for advocating for the District to resolve the BTSA issue and will be crafting a letter of thanks for the Board to sign.

Following the explanation, the Board approved the Memorandum of Understanding for 2014-2015 between Newark Unified School District, Local Educational Agency for East Bay Induction Consortium (EBBIC) and the San Leandro Unified School District. 

It was noted that the Board received a revised school lunch pricing, stating that the Middle Schools meals were increasing from $2.50 to $2.75 (not $2.25 to $2.50 as previously indicated).

The Board approved the School Lunch Pricing for 2014-2015 and 2015-2016 as amended.

The Board approved the recommendation from the Director of Student Services for the Readmission from Expulsion for Case E17-13/14.  The students has met all the rehabilitation plan and is eligible to return to a comprehensive program.

Trustee Prola commented, that while she would be approving the readmission of this student, she voiced concern about the number of unexcused absences reported during this student's rehabilitation term.

The Board approved the recommendation from the Director of Student Services for the Readmission from Expulsion for Case E21-13/14.  The student has met all the rehabilitation plan and is eligible to return to a comprehensive program.

The Board approved the recommendation from the Director of Student Services for the Stipulated Expulsion Order for Student E31-13/14.

The Board approved the Purchase of Dell Chromebooks for Students.

Responding to Trustee Prola regarding The Renaissance START 360 Assessment Solution, Dr. Mucetti, said that this will provide formative and summative math and early reading assessments as we go along.

The Board approved the Purchase of the Renaissance STAR 360 Assessment Solution.

The Board approved the MOU between California Partnership for Achieving Student Success (CAL-PASS PLUS) and San Leandro USD for Sharing Academic Performance Data for 2014-2015. 

PUBLIC COMMENT

Carlos Cruz, and Craig Simpson, Business Technology Consultant, from Caltronics, addressed the Board regarding the Proposed Value Lease Agreement with Ray Morgan Company for Comprehensive Document Management Services and Copier Systems, citing estimated savings and lease buy out concerns, which they feel is not in the best interest of the District. Stating that Caltronics has been providing copier needs for the District for the last ten years, they urged the Board to reconsider approving the contract with Ray Morgan at this point and to allow vendors, including Caltronics, an opportunity to earn our business for this type of contract. 

Following the Public Comments a discussion ensued regarding how the District arrived at the decision to go with the Ray Morgan Company and asking if this was a time sensitive issue to allow more time for further consideration.

With that, a motion was made by Trustee Prola, and seconded by Trustee Katz-Lacabe to table this item until the next meeting; however ended in the following 3-3 tie vote:

• Trustees Prola, Lopez, Katz-Lacabe voting yes to table
• Trustees James, Carey, Rosato voting no to table

Following the vote, John Propersi, Area Vice President for the Ray Morgan Company provided background information on what their company was offering in response to concerns raised, adding that this was not just for copier systems, but also included document management services.

Trustee Rosato then moved and Trustee Carey seconded to call for the question, by a 5-1 vote.  

• Trustees Carey, James, Lopez, Prola, Rosato voting yes to call the question
• Trustee Katz-Lacabe vote no to call the question

The Board then approved the Proposed Value Lease Agreement with Ray Morgan Company for Comprehensive Document Management Services and Copier Systems by the following 4-2 vote:  

Miscellaneous Receipts in the amount of $25,263,805.51 have been deposited in the amount Treasury of Alameda County.

The Board received for information suspension data for the last three years in the San Leandro Unified School District.  This data was submitted to Axiom, an organization that we contract with for services in order to meet mandated school and District data collection requirements.

Non Applicable

Board of Education

Trustee Roato asked for and received consensus to look into having more student representation on the Board such as, elementary, middle, and high school.  This item will be brought back for consideration for the next school year.  

Trustee Prola asked for and received consensus to form a committee to consider naming the new health and wellness center after a person, as was done with the Fred T. Korematsu Campus. 

The Board will discuss, review, and consider the items on the San Leandro Board Consensus Report. 

Board Bylaws 

At the February 25, 2014, at the request of Trustee Rosato, it was the consensus of the Board to include an on-going list of items that the needed additional information or action on the agenda so that follow-up would be completed in a timely manner.  The Consensus Request Summary spreadsheet is attached for your information. The spreadsheet will be provided to the Board at every Board meeting for continued review and consideration.  Detailed information regarding items on the spreadsheet will be attached as it becomes available.   

Mike McLaughlin, Ed.D., Superintendent

Trustee Carey proudly announced that his son, a San Leandro High School graduate, is now working at Cal Berkeley as an athletic trainer. 

Trustee Prola attended the opening day of the Summer Teaching Innovation Conference at the Fred T. Korematsu (FTK) campus, commenting that it was nice to see the energy that filled the room.  

Trustee Lopez also attended the conference today and agreed the energy was very positive. She is looking forward to attending the second session tomorrow.  She commended the District for selecting a local-based contracting company for the School Based Health Care Center Construction Project.

Trustee Katz-Lacabe congratulated Trustees Carey and James, who will be returning as Board Trustees for another 4-year term, as they were running unopposed in the November election. Trustee Katz-Lacabe is looking forward to the beginning of the school year. Trustee Katz-Lacabe mentioned the Moody's down grade of the District's Bond debt, and the impact to the District. Associate Superintendent Chin-Bendib explained that the impact would be for future issuances of bonds for any bond measure, adding that according to our financial advisor, will cost the District about a 1/4 of a percent, because the fund balance in our General Fund has been depleting, which was a primary concern of Moody's.

Trustee James attended the high school registration with his son, and found it to be a great experience.  He will be attending the Teaching and Innovation Conference tomorrow at FTK.  

• Regular Board Meeting - August 26, 2014
• Regular Board Meeting - September 9, 2014
• Regular Board Meeting - October 7, 2014
• Regular Board Meeting - October 21, 2014
• Regular Board Meeting - November 4, 2014
• Regular Board Meeting - November 18, 2014
• Regular Board Meeting - December 2, 2014
• Regular Board Meeting - December 9, 2014
• Regular Board Meeting - January 13, 2015
• Regular Board Meeting - January 27, 2015
• Regular Board Meeting - February 10, 2015
• Regular Board Meeting - March 10, 2015
• Regular Board Meeting - April 7, 2015
• Regular Board Meeting - April 21, 2015
• Regular Board Meeting - May 5, 2015
• Regular Board Meeting - May 19, 2015
• Regular Board Meeting - June 2, 2015
• Regular Board Meeting - June 23, 2015

• Regular Board Meeting - August 26, 2014
• Regular Board Meeting - September 9, 2014
• Regular Board Meeting - October 7, 2014
• Regular Board Meeting - October 21, 2014
• Regular Board Meeting - November 4, 2014
• Regular Board Meeting - November 18, 2014
• Regular Board Meeting - December 2, 2014
• Regular Board Meeting - December 9, 2014
• Regular Board Meeting - January 13, 2015
• Regular Board Meeting - January 27, 2015
• Regular Board Meeting - February 10, 2015
• Regular Board Meeting - March 10, 2015
• Regular Board Meeting - April 7, 2015
• Regular Board Meeting - April 21, 2015
• Regular Board Meeting - May 5, 2015
• Regular Board Meeting - May 19, 2015
• Regular Board Meeting - June 2, 2015
• Regular Board Meeting - June 23, 2015

The meeting was adjourned at 9:05 p.m.