The Presiding Officer will call the meeting to order at 6:00 p.m. The Board will recess to Closed Session at 6:00 p.m. and reconvene in Public Session at 7:00 p.m.

Approve the regular meeting agenda of September 20, 2011

Members of the audience, who wish to address the Board, please complete the yellow card available at the entrance and submit it to the board's Administrative Assistant. Cards are to be turned in before the item is reached on the agenda.

The Board of Education and Superintendent recognized Paul Stier, and on behalf of Rose Young, Principals of Young Office Solutions, for their excellent service and generous donations with a Certificate of Appreciation.  Young Office Solutions is the furniture supplier for the Fred T. Korematsu Campus and the San Leandro High School Library Expansion. Mike Murphy, Director of Measure B and Bond Projects, made a few remarks about how the company's excellent professional services and flexibility made it possible to have eight truckloads of furniture delivered and installed in time to open the new campus on the first day of the 2010-2011 school year.  In addition to their professional and responsive customer service and high quality furnishings, Young Office Solutions also generously donated an estimated $21,000 in furniture to the District.

Linda Granger, Principal, and Elisa Alvarez, Assistant Principal, of San Leandro High School provided a presentation regarding safety at the San Leandro High School Main campus and the FTK Campus. The presentation included information regarding: 

• Student Data 
  • Demographics
  • Summary 2009-2010 Health Kids Survey
  • Roles and responsibilities of the campus supervisors, which includes 5 campus supervisors on the main campus; 2 campus supervisors on the FTK campus; and 1 campus supervisor for after-school programs
  • Responsibilities of the two School Resource Officers (SROs) who are working extended hours this year and serve as liaisons with the school and the police department to reduce crime and oversee students who are on probation in the school
• Description of student behavior and expectations, and interventions in place
• Analysis of facility and recommendations to address physical plant limitations
• Analysis of staffing allocations and needs with recommendations for staffing changes

The Board thanked the high school staff for the presentation and asked clarifying questions, offered comments and suggestions, which were addressed by the presenters. 

The Board asked staff to provide a timeline for implementation of some of the recommendations and for the Superintendent to provide an update on the two students who mentioned being bullied and physically hurt at the Community Forum in the CS.  

Following the presentation at 8:56 p.m., the Board took a break and returned to open session at 9:00 p.m.

DISTRICT GOAL #5: Ensure Safe and Well Maintained Facilities

Linda Granger, Principal and Elisa Alvarez Assistant Principal of San Leandro High School will provide a presentation regarding safety at the San Leandro High School Main campus and the FTK Campus.  The presentation will include information regarding:

• Student data
• Campus Supervision roles and responsibilities
• School Resource Officers
• Analysis of site physical resources and needs
• Analysis of staffing allocations and needs
• Behavior Expectations
• Behavior Tiered Intervention Programs, Plans, and Services
• Communication Systems
• Crisis response
• Challenges and Recommendations

A public  hearing was held regarding Sufficiency of Instructional Materials for the 2011-2012 school year.

Public Hearing Comments are limited to 3 minutes per speaker, subject to adjustment by the Board President. Members of the audience who wish to address the Board regarding the Public Hearing are asked to complete the yellow card available at the entrance and submit it to the Board's Administrative Assistant.

Education Code Section 60119 as revised by Chapter 900, Statutes of 2004 and CCR, Title 5, Section 9531(c) as amended, requires the Board of Education to annually certify through a resolution as to whether each pupil in each school in the district has, or will have prior to the end of that fiscal year, sufficient textbooks or instructional materials, or both, in each subject including English learners, in mathematics, science, laboratory science equipment for science laboratory classes in grades 9-12, foreign language, health classes, history-social science, and English/language arts, including the English language development component of an adopted program, consistent with the content and cycles or the curriculum frameworks adopted by the state board. 

If the Board of Education determines that there are insufficient textbooks and/or instructional materials, the Board of Education shall provide information to classroom teachers and to the public, setting forth the reasons and take any action to ensure that each pupil has sufficient textbooks or instructional materials within two months of the beginning of the school year in which the determination is made. 

This required public hearing informs parents and community about the compliance and statement of assurance for the pupil textbook and instructional materials sufficiency or insufficiency of instructional materials for the 2011-2012 school year and offers them the opportunity to address the Board regarding this matter. 

On a motion made by Trustee Katz-Lacabe and seconded by Trustee James, the Board opened the public hearing regarding Sufficiency of Instructional Materials for the 2011-2012 school year by a 7-0 vote. 

No comments were received from the audience. 

On a motion made by Trustee Katz-Lacabe and seconded by Trustee James, the Board closed the public hearing regarding Sufficiency of Instructional Materials for the 2011-2012 school year by a 7-0 vote. 

Education Code Section 60119 as revised by Chapter 900, Statutes of 2004 and CCR, Title 5, Section 9531(c) as amended, requires the Board of Education to annually certify through a resolution as to whether each pupil in each school in the district has, or will have prior to the end of that fiscal year, sufficient textbooks or instructional materials, or both, in each subject including English learners, in mathematics, science, laboratory science equipment for science laboratory classes in grades 9-12, foreign language, health classes, history-social science, and English/language arts, including the English language development component of an adopted program, consistent with the content and cycles or the curriculum frameworks adopted by the state board. 

If the Board of Education determines that there are insufficient textbooks and/or instructional materials, the Board of Education shall provide information to classroom teachers and to the public, setting forth the reasons and take any action to ensure that each pupil has sufficient textbooks or instructional materials within two months of the beginning of the school year in which the determination is made. 

This required public hearing informs parents and community about the compliance and statement of assurance for the pupil textbook and instructional materials sufficiency or insufficiency of instructional materials for the 2011-2012 school year and offers them the opportunity to address the Board regarding this matter.

These items are presented for action at this time.  some may have been reviewed at a previous meeting.

Trustee Almonte reported receipt of the following emails between September 6, 2011 through September 19, 2011: From CSBA regarding "Message from Director Laura re: Golden Bell Awards", "Are you registered for  Back To School?", "Message from Director Laura and Newsletter from Vernon Billy", "Director-at-large Nominations close September 30", "California School News", "SBE now accepting Student Member Applications", "Annual Education Conference News", "California Schools Magazine", and "Your last change to register for Back to School"; from Benito Delgado-Olson regarding "400,000 starts tonight at Contra Costa"; from Marily Mondejar and Angeles Anaphase regarding "Celebration Gala to honor 100 Influential Women", "Special Invitation: Mayor's Reception to honor 100 Influential Women", and "V-Day presents Eve Ensselr at  Grace Cathedral"; from Erick Christen regarding "Ask Governor Brown to Veto Three Project Labor Agreements"; from San Leandro Education Foundation regarding "Help a Teacher bring new materials to our Schools"; from Sheila Jordan regarding "You're Invited to attend Teacher of the Year Awards Ceremony"; from the Coalition to Fair Employment in Construction regarding "Action Alert: Fight for Fair and Open Competition"; from Michele Minsuk regarding "SLUSD Transfer Policy"; from Cynthia Vincent regarding "Youth Clipper Card"; from Senator Ellen Corbett regarding "Information on Upcoming Job Fair"; from Tony Sodoro regarding "Partners in Education"; from Jon Sherr and Ramona M. Ansolabonhere regarding "Safety concerns"; from Ron Polk, Zaira Duncan Gwen Gregory, Mary Halatsis, David Ellington, Anthony Farley, Sean Tobin, John Othen, and John Sheridan regarding "Incident"; from Rick Richards regarding "Keep Music Rockin' Foundation: Learning from the Masters and Annual Holidays with Lenny Williams"; from Girls Inc. of Alameda County regarding "Friends, Tickets & Women of Taste 2011"; and from the Filipino American International Book Festival regarding "Press Release: Filbookfedst Authors. 

Jack Martin, Student Board Member, updated the Board on activities at the San Leandro High School main campus and Fred T. Korematsu 9th grade campus. Highlights included:

• The sport teams are doing well, noting that for the first time in a very long time, the Girls' Tennis Team beat Bishop O'Dowd
• Today students, along with teacher Jack Nelson, participated in the "Amador to Our Door" marathon in support of our school programs and to raise awareness for victims of violent crimes
• The first Hello Rally, organized by the Associate Student Body, took place
• Club Day last week was very successful, with many students signing up

He also addressed the recent incidents that occurred at the high school, stating that from what he gathered from students and teachers, a majority said, that while it was surprising, it is more of an expected thing; however, they didn't feel that they were in any immediate danger.

Responding to President Mack-Rose, he said that the upcoming student forum will be Sept. 29 with the time and place TBD.

Mark Hamilton, on behalf of the San Leandro Teachers' Association (SLTA), reported that there was a Representative Council meeting last week, noting that for the first time, many of the campuses experienced contested representative elections, indicating additional interest.  More staff development is being planned and they are looking forward to going to the table to make some inroads towards making sure that we can provide quality education for our students despite the economic crises.

Superintendent Cindy Cathey commented on the community forum on safety, stating that many ideas emerged, with  students, parents, and teachers genuinely sharing their concerns and ideas which will provide stepping stones to our next steps when we form the Task Force. Following the forum, she spoke with the Police Chief regarding "hot line texting" possibly to be implemented within 30 days. The Superintendent thanked Trustee Sullivan for stepping in to be interviewed by Channel 4 News, adding that she had been interviewed earlier. 

There was a Measure M Community Forum at the high school, and she thanked Trustee James for attending.  The forum included some "lively" conversations related to Burrell Field, scoreboards for the softball fields, which are not currently in the configuration and the impact on the construction of the pool on the high school swim team and Drowning Darryls. 

The elementary Back-to-School night was successful and she thanked those who were able to attend.

The San Leandro Education Foundation (SLED) will have it's annual meeting tomorrow, September 21 at 6:30 p.m.

Back-to-School night at the two middle schools is Thursday night, September 22. 

Trustee Katz-Lacabe reported that the committee met on September 9 and discussed exploring the process of changing the Board from a 7-member to a 5-member; however, they felt, at this time, they should focus on the possibility of a Parcel Tax rather than reducing the number of Trustees to five. In addition they discussed redistricting in response to the 2010 Census data, strengthening the public image of our schools particularly focusing on the Arts Education Center website, along with branding and marketing ideas, updating the district's website, and communication goals for 2011-2012.

Trustee Katz-Lacabe also reported that the Advocacy Committee met on September 9 and discussed exploring the feasibility of a Parcel Tax for 2012.    

Trustee Katz-Lacabe reported that the committee met on September 15, 2011, and heard an update on the Bond Measure M that included the schematic design and a land use agreement for Burrell Field.  They also discussed the Truancy Reduction Program/Daytime Curfew and the Forum on Children: San Leandro as a Child Friendly Community.

Trustee Prola reported that the meeting last week was cancelled; however, they had looked at a Change Order for DL Falk for the San Leandro High School Career Technical Education (CTE )Project which was being brought forward for consideration tonight, along with approval of the Master Schedule for Measure M.  The next meeting will be tomorrow, September 21.

The following item was pulled from the Consent Calendar:

• Q1-Certificated Personnel Report (Mack-Rose)

Trustee Mack-Rose asked if the District could expect more certificated appointments this year. Senior Director II John Thompson stated that currently there are several positions posted on Ed Join, however, the District has not yet filled several new Special Education positions that are being added, but are moving as quickly as we can to fill them. 

Last spring, our San Leandro Education Foundation applied and were awarded a $15,000 Kaiser Foundation Grant for the PLUS Program, a safe schools cyberbullying training program for both middle schools. To complete the cyberbullying program costs, OSISoft, Inc. donated the remaining $6,500 to SLED for this program.  

The PLUS Program includes the following for each middle school:

• 1 Cyberbullying and Bullying Awareness Student Assembly (up to 3 assemblies to accommodate all students) promoting healthy youth development - Fall
• 1 Staff Development Workshop on concepts and strategies to address emerging youth cybertrends - Fall
• 1 Parent/Community Workshop to focus on current youth cybertrends and critical issues impacting positive youth development - Fall
• Implementation of the training and to sustain the efforts through a student leadership empowerment model where student leaders are trained to facilitate student forums on issues related to cyberbullying - Spring
• Three months after the training, there is a follow up consultation to support the schools

Each middle school will be scheduling their trainings for the fall.  The contract includes costs of t-shirts, curriculum, and travel.  The entire cost of the program is $21,500.

New non-public school placement contract for the school year 2011-2012.

Communication Works - Speech Therapist for Pre-K Community Speech students and case overload.  

The project will be funded by Measure B Local Bond and State grant funds.  This Change Order #9 represents an increase of $38,360 to the prior contract amount of $5,034,393 for a new contract amount of $5,072,753.  The project is within the construction budget of $6,501,349.

Approve Change Order #9, in the amount of $38,360, to the Construction Contract with D.L. Falk Construction, Inc. for the San Leandro High School Career Technical Education Project, a 0.76% increase to the prior construction contract amount of $5,034,393.

Renovation of the CTE Center, Shop Building, was identified in the Measure B language. AEDIS Architects was retained to prepare the design and construction documents for the renovation.  Plans and specifications were approved by the Division of the State Architect (DSA) and the project was bid through the requirements of Public Contract Code.  The project is scheduled to be completed during the next two years.  Work began during the 2010 summer break when no students were present.  The renovation will include structural improvements, restrooms, new shop equipment, lighting, roofing, and painting.

The Board previously approved the construction contract with D.L. Falk Construction Inc. on April 14, 2010.

Subsequently the Board approved:

• Change Order (CO) #1 on December 7, 2010, in the amount of $57,695.
• CO #2 on January 11, 2011, in the amount of $20,424.
• CO #3 on February 8, 2011, in the amount of $30,672.
• CO #4 on April 19, 2011, in the amount of $144,251.
• CO #5 on July 19, 2011, in the amount of $101,496.
• CO #6 on July 19, 2011, in the amount of $88,980.
• CO #7 on August 2, 2011, in the amount of $93,104.
• CO #8 on August 16, 2011, in the amount of $53,771.

This CO #9 in the amount of $38,360 is a 0.76% increase to the prior construction contract amount of $5,034,393.  The project remains substantially below the construction budget of $6,501,349.

Item 9.7 is an acknowledged specification error by AEDIS Architects and Joe Vela, a principal of the firm, has offered to compensate the District for the item cost.  The project Construction Manager, Dana LeSher, had identified this error some time ago and had approached Joe Vela to resolve it to the District?s benefit.  To that end AEDIS will provide a credit on one of their invoices for architectural services.  Although a large effort at multiple levels is applied to preventing errors in the design documents this and other similar types of relatively minor specification errors are not uncommon.  Normally, a great amount time and resource (program and construction managers) is spent on design review, bid-ability review, and construct-ability review to catch errors such as this.  These professionals will continue their efforts in critical review of all construction documents.

CO #9 Summary

Contract Summary

Before moving ahead with the two conference items, Trustee Mack-Rose requested, and the Board agreed, that Conference Item W1, Schematic  Design for the SLHS Swim Center and Fields, funding through Measure M, be moved forward before Conference Item V2, Redesign of the AERIES/CALPADS Program, as representatives from WLC Architects, the Conceptual Design team, and the Drowning Darryls were present. 

These items are submitted for advance planning and to assist the Board in establishing future agenda items.  The Board may, however, take action on the following:

PUBLIC COMMENT

• Jerry Engler commended those involved in the process; however, expressed concern regarding how the construction schedule  might impact the swim teams.  He urged the Board to do whatever possible to shorten and expedite the construction timeline.

Assistant Superintendent of Educational Services Debbie Wong gave a presentation on the redesign of the Aeries Student Information System and California Longitudinal Pupil Achievement Data System (CALPADS), emphasizing the critical need for timely and accurate data collection in order to fulfill legal compliance reports and certification.  She stated, Aeries Student Information System is an essential function our schools and the District.  We depend on it for accurate and timely data necessary to access enrollment, attendance, grades, parent communication, discipline, assessment, and program evaluation to name a few areas. With the growing demands for student information from internal and external sources as well as CALPADS certification requirements, Educational Services is unable to sustain services based on current staffing levels.  With the current capacity, we have been unable to meet timelines for routine and new work for our school sites, meet deadlines for our program grants, maintain accurate data in the system, and just recently failed to certify with the State's Fall 2 CALPADS certification, which is serious. Another one of our greatest concerns is our inability to evaluate current categorical and grant programs serving our students. She quoted the overarching Aeries assessment finding conducted in June 2011: "There is a strong need for improvement in the way data is gathered, entered, and reported across the District and that this has resulted in confusion, inefficiency, duplication of effort among staff and, at times, inability to provide needed data.  There is a general lack of uniformity and consistency of process for working with student data across the District."

Staff provided the Board with two options:

Option 1: Create a new department in Educational Services: Student Data and Accountability

• Decouple the Aeries/CALPADS work from Curriculum & Instruction
• Restructure the work related to student data including assessment
• Eliminate the position of Assistant Director of Research & Program Evaluation to restructure two manager positions: (1) Director of Student Data and Accountability and Coordinator of Data and Assessment
  • Approximate Total Cost for 2011-2012: $120,000,including benefits
  • No direct impact to the General Fund: $105,000 from District MAA, $15,000 from City ASES one-time carryover

Option 2:  Add a Coordinator of Assessment to Curriculum & Instruction and restructure the work of the Assistant Director of Research and Program Evaluation 

• • Approximate Total Cost: $103,770, Step 5
    $111,200 including benefits
  • No direct impact to the General Fund: $96,200 from District MAA, $15,000 from City ASES one-time carryover

The Board agreed that it was important that the District meet CALPADS certification requirements. Trustees Sullivan, Almonte and James felt that creating a new department in Education Services (Option 1) would support the growing needs, requirements, and overall health of the District; however, Trustees Carey, James, Katz-Lacabe, Mack-Rose, and Prola raised concerns regarding the funding sources i.e. one-time City ASES carryover and the sustainability of MAA funding, noting that in light of the District's financial situation and constraints, preferred, at this time, Option 2: Add a Coordinator of Assessment to Curriculum & Instruction and restructure the work of the Assistant Director of Research and Program Evaluation. 

As the meeting approached the 10:30 p.m. adjournment, on a motion was made by Trustee Katz-Lacabe, and seconded by Trustee James at 10:23 p.m., the Board meeting was extended to 11:30 p.m., by a 7-0 vote

After the discussion, Trustee Katz-Lacabe then made a motion to approve Option 2: Add a Coordinator of Assessment to Curriculum & Instruction and restructure the work of the Assistant Director of Research and Program Evaluation, which passed by the following vote:

Aeries Student Information System is an essential function our schools and the District.  We depend on it for accurate and timely data necessary to access enrollment, attendance, grades, parent communication, discipline, assessment, and program evaluation to name a few areas. With the growing demands for student information from internal and external sources as well as CALPADS certification requirements, Educational Services is unable to sustain services based on current staffing levels.  With the current capacity, we have been unable to meet timelines for routine and new work for our school sites, meet deadlines for our program grants, maintain accurate data in the system, and just recently failed to certify with the State's Fall 2 CALPADS certification, which is serious. Another one of our greatest concerns is our inability to evaluate current categorical and grant programs serving our students.

The District requested an external Aeries assessment late spring. The overarching result indicated that "There is a strong need for improvement in the way data is gathered, entered, and reported across the District and that this has resulted in confusion, inefficiency, duplication of effort among staff and, at times, inability to provide needed data.  There is a general lack of uniformity and consistency of process for working with student data across the District."  

As an Aeries user for the past 10 years, our staffing structure included one information data technician, part of the work of one educational data secretary, and overseen by the Assistant Director of Research & Program Evaluation in the Department of Curriculum & Instruction.  For the size of our District, this is inadequate.  Through the years, we have been unable to effectively systematize and maximize user processes and accountability for our many purposes thus the capacity building of common processes is compromised.

The proposal is to redesign the work of Aeries and CALPADS to support our growing needs, requirements, and overall health of the District.  Currently this work is embedded into Curriculum & Instruction.  The proposal is to de-couple it from this department and form its own department under Educational Services since this work serves every school and every department in the District.  

The presentation will outline the details of the proposal for your discussion and consideration. 

Due to the lateness of the hour, the Board felt they would be better served by scheduling a special workshop to discuss Conference Item X1-Draft 2011-12 District Goals and X2-Board Self-Evaluation.  Superintendent Cathey and President Mack-Rose will work together to schedule a work session, so that the Board can focus their full attention that these items deserve.  

On an annual basis the Board of Education discusses their priorities and the needs of the District around which they establish District goals for the current school year. For the 2010-2011 school year, the Board identified five major areas of focus; Those areas included: 

1. Educate the Whole Child: Ensuring the academic, physical, social and emotional well-being of every student emotional 
2. Financial Stability: Ensure the fiscal solvency of the District
3. Communication and Community Engagement: Ensure ease of access to accurate and timely information 
4. Human Resources: Attract and retain high quality teachers, administrators, and classified staff E
5. Ensure Safe and Well Maintained Facilities: Maintain and improve our existing facilities 

It is recommended that the Board maintain these five overarching goals as the District goals for the 2011-2012 school year and add Goal #6: Board Governance. For each overarching goal, there are subgoals which further delineate the areas of focus and provide direction to staff. 

The Board provided input to the Superintendent at the Board meeting on September 7, 2011.  The suggested changes have been incorporated into the revised draft of the goals.  The draft 2011-2012 District goals and sub-goals will be available at the meeting.

The Board will further discuss, refine and possibly adopt the goals for implementation during the 2011-2012 school year. Upon adoption, the Superintendent along with staff will identify specific action steps, with measurable outcomes, to be implemented throughout the school year. These action steps will support the Superintendent and staff in meeting the Board goals and priorities. 

Professional Governance Standards as adopted by the California School Boards Association (CBSA) are used by local governing boards to help increase board effectiveness and raise public awareness of the role of governing boards. It is common for boards to complete a self-evaluation survey as one way to assess their effectiveness and to identify areas of growth and next steps. One component on the self-evaluation survey is Governance Responsibilities which includes: Setting Direction, Establishing Structure, Providing Support, Ensuring Accountability, and Community Leadership. A second component on the survey is Effective Board Operations which includes: Board Unity, Board Role, Board Culture, Board Structure, Preparing for Meetings, Conducting Meetings, and Managing Transitions. The San Leandro Board of Education, in keeping CSBA recommended effective governance structures, completed the survey and will review and discuss the survey summary. The summary information will be used to identify areas of strength and areas of growth for the Board as a whole for the 2011-2012 school year. The Self-Evaluation Survey is attached.

Miscellaneous receipts in the amount of $5,223,537.59 have been deposited in the Treasury of Alameda County.

Trustee Almonte commented on International Day of Peace which was established in 1981 to coincide with the opening of the General Assembly and is celebrated on September 21 each year to recognize the efforts of those who have worked hard to end conflict and promote peace. The International Day of Peace is also a day of ceasefire- personal or political. 

Trustee Prola asked for clarification regarding the role of the Board, should we have a major disaster such as an earthquake, and asked the Superintendent for direction. She also shared her frustration of spending at least ten minutes navigating through the District phone system and asked that this be addressed.  Trustee Prola reminded the Board of the Alameda County Teacher of Year Awards, which will be held at the Arts Education Center on October 6. 

Trustee Carey attended Back-To-School Night at Wilson Elementary School.  He was happy to see all of the positive input shared at the Community Forum, and noted that the name plates that the community can purchase are beginning to be placed on the seats in the AEC.  He will be attending Back-To-School Night at Muir.  He also received an invitation from Jennifer Gravem, Associate Principal of the Fred T. Korematsu campus, to join her in a tour of the facility.  He plans on following up. 

Trustee Katz-Lacabe noted that in relation to the Forum last night, the single biggest factor for determining whether a student brings a gun is not race, or socioeconomic status, it's how they are doing academically and whether they are supervised after they leave school. He hoped that in the long term, the District's Tiered Intervention would address that issue.

Trustee James commented that in relation to technology, the Policy Committee should consider establishing a District policy with regards to teachers/professional "friending" their students on Facebook. He also shared comments made by a Williams Act inspector that her visit to Garfield "was fabulous" and thanked those involved with that visit.  Responding to Trustee Prola, he thought that as a member of the public sector, the Board is required, as all district employees are, to report to a center in the event of a major disaster. Trustee James attended Back-To-School Night at Washington and Roosevelt Elementary Schools. 

Trustee Sullivan felt that a lot of good ideas were shared at the Forum.  She also noted that as a member of the Disaster Preparedness Council which meets quarterly, she shared with the Superintendent a list of contacts in case of an emergency. She hoped to try and visit the middle schools for their Back-To-Night.

Trustee Mack-Rose thanked staff for all of the extra hours spent on the incidents that occurred recently at the high school.  She also commented that it would be a good idea for a Board member to participate in the task force to develop a comprehensive safety plan which is being created by the high school principal.  Trustee Mack-Rose will discuss the process with the Superintendent. 

• Regular Board Meeting ? October 4, 2011 
• Tentative Board Work Session - October 11, 2011 
• Regular Board Meeting ? October 18, 2011 
• Regular Board Meeting ? November 1, 2011 
• Tentative Board Work Session - November 8, 2011 
• Regular Board Meeting ? November 15, 2011 
• Regular Board Meeting ? December 6, 2011 S
• Special Board Meeting ? December 13, 2011 
• Regular Board Meeting ? January 10, 2012 
• Tentative Board Work Session - January 17, 2012 
• Regular Board Meeting ? January 24, 2012 
• Regular Board Meeting ? February 7, 2012 
• Tentative Board Work Session - February 14, 2012 
• Regular Board Meeting ? March 6, 2012 
• Special Board Meeting ? March 13, 2012 
• Regular Board Meeting ? March 20, 2012 
• Regular Board Meeting ? April 3, 2012 
• Regular Board Meeting ? April 17, 2012 
• Regular Board Meeting ? May 1, 2012 
• Tentative Board Work Session - May 8, 2012 
• Regular Board Meeting ? May 15, 2012 
• Regular Board Meeting ? June 5, 2012 
• Regular Board Meeting ? June 19, 2012 
• Special Board Meeting ? June 26, 2012