Regular (Virtual) Board Meeting

Minutes

Roll call was taken and all board members were present.

Link to this item

Minutes

There were no items to report from closed session.

Link to this item

Minutes

President Oshinski led the audience in the pledge of allegiance.

Link to this item

Actions

Motion Passed with a motion by James Aguilar and a second by Leo Sheridan. | Vote: Yes James Aguilar .; Yes Student Board Member .; Yes Evelyn Gonzalez .; Yes Peter Oshinski .; Yes Diana Prola .; Yes Christian Rodriguez .; Yes Leo Sheridan .; Yes Monique Tate .

Link to this item

Speaker

Dr. Sonal Patel

Rationale

Dr. Sonal Patel, Assistant Superintendent, Educational Services, will provide a staff report pertaining to San Leandro Catalyst Collegiate Charter School Petition.

Minutes

Dr. Sonal Patel, Assistant Superintendent of Educational Services, provided a district summary of the staff report pertaining to the San Leandro Catalyst Collegiate Charter School. Dr. Patel shared the charter petition process, major findings and staff recommendations over the course of this presentation. Timeline: The petition for the charter school was submitted to the school district on February 3. A meeting was held with the petitioners on March 3 to provide formal introductions, discuss the public hearing process and ask additional questions. On March 10, 2020 petitioners provided a presentation, public comment was heard during the public hearing portion of the regularly scheduled board meeting. Subsequently, on April 6, 2020, another set of questions from school district staff was provided to San Leandro Catalyst Collegiate Charter School (SLCC) staff to better understand the petition. Upon receiving the responses, the school district finalized the staff report which was made available to the public several days before this board meeting. The board will take action at this board meeting to approve or deny this petition. The charter petition was reviewed upon receipt by the district's assistant superintendent's: Dr. Sonal Patel, Dr. Kevin Collins, Assistant Superintendent of Business & Operations, and Dr. Zarina Zanipatin, Assistant Superintendents of Administrative Services. They engaged their staff experts in various divisions and departments to review the charter petition components best under their expertise. Through analyzing the petition, the team came up with findings which were drafted into the report by our assistant superintendent team in concert with our legal counsel in assurance that we were following charter process review guidelines. As the team reviewed the charter petition and reviewed all the findings, they determined that they must recommend a denial of the petition based on two factors: Factor 1 - Petitioners are demonstrably unlikely to successfully implement the program pursuant to Ed. Code 47605(c)(2). Factor 2 - The Petition does not contain reasonably required elements set forth in Ed. Code 47605(b)(5)(A-O). The team found eight major findings that illustrate the petitioners are demonstrably unlikely to successfully meet their goals. The eight finding are listed below: 1. Unfamiliarity with current charter school legal requirements • English Learner Education program describes out of date reclassification and progress monitoring criteria • Audit procedures not compliant with the California Nonprofit Integrity Act of 2004 • Failure to address legal requirements regarding sexual harassment training 2. Lack necessary background in operating an elementary school • None of the Petitioners have experience as the head administrator of a school • None of the Petitions have any elementary administrative experience • Proposed school director does not hold a Clear Administrative Service Credential 3. Teacher recruitment and retention • All teachers who signed Petition as "meaningfully interested" currently teach at an OUSD charter school - Aspire Berkeley Maynard Academy which renewed December 2, 2019 • 27% longer work and 13% longer work year; no defined pension system and no collective bargaining agreement which makes it hard to recruit highly qualified teachers during an extreme teacher shortage 4. Teacher employment policies and procedures • Staff performance evaluation process is vague, and lacks substantive evaluation criteria, such as the California Standards for the Teaching Profession • Petition does not affirm that hired teachers will be "highly qualified" and NCLB (ESSA) compliant 5. Student recruitment and retention; class sizes • 30:1 TK-3 class size is 25% higher than District's maximum of 24:1 • Combined TK/K format not for instructional or pedagogical design, but to increase enrollment (read: ADA) and simplify scheduling: fiscal efficiency and operational convenience • 15 chromebooks per 30 students (two students per device) is below SLUSD one to one stand and not adequate for emergency distance learning 6. Failure to identify a location where charter will operate • Does not identify proposed location • Does not address any available inventory of possible appropriate locations within district boundaries • Does not demonstrate any fiscal planning or evaluation for a location • Does not adequately describe the types and potential locations needed 7. Proposed budget is unclear, reflected dubious assumptions • Multiple areas of the budget are unclear or based on dubious assumptions - raises concerns regarding the thoroughness of financial planning • Title 1 revenue assumptions, instructional material costs, janitorial/custodial costs, special education costs, and translation services are far from adequate 8. Potential civil liability effects and insurance coverage • Petition does not describe the amounts of insurance coverage that will be maintained • This vagueness prevents the District from being able to ascertain whether such coverage will be sufficient enough to protect the students and staff from potential liability The Ed Code stated in factor #2, 47605(b)(5)(A-O) contains 15 elements. The District staff and legal counsel have considered each element of the Petition in light of the standard for a "reasonably comprehensive" program description and the specific criteria for each required element as set out in Cal. Code of Regulations, Title 5, section 11967.5.1(g). Upon review it was determined that 7 out of 15 elements proposed are not reasonably comprehensively described. They are: Educational Program Governance Structure Healthy and Safety Admission Policies and Procedures Annual Financial Audits Dispute Resolution Process Closure Procedures Educational program Deficiencies The educational program described in the petition also needs to contain a reasonably comprehensive description of the educational program for special student populations. This includes students with disabilities, English learner education and socioeconomically disadvantaged students, homeless students and foster youth. It is mentioned but program is not reasonably comprehensive. This section has deficiencies in 5 sub areas: A. Science & Engineering • Stated program is misaligned, lacks resources, with no listed curriculum or formative assessment strategies • There was no articulated plan to explicitly and formatively assess science and engineering progress beyond state-mandated CAST for 5th grade • It is incongruous with Petitioner's stated goals about education valuing creativity and STEM learning B. Literacy/English Language Arts • There are no explicit descriptions of how the needs of culturally and linguistically diverse student body will be met • Language - SLUSD students represent 38 language groups, yet there is no mention of affirming and validating home (primary) languages through primary language support systems C. Assessment and Grading • There was a vague description of assessment tools and how assessments will be specifically used to inform shifts in instructional practice • Lack of clarity undermines plans for intervention and enrichment and poses a critical foundational weakness also reflected in the proposed multi-tiered system of supports D. Professional Development • There were no specific training content details • The schedule devotes little time for curriculum development and instructional strategies • Induction training – There was no description of where induction training and support for new teachers will come from or required training credentials • There was also no mention of literacy training in the induction training program E. Transitional Kindergarten and Kindergarten • There were no cited materials aligned to the Preschool Foundations and early childhood development which should inform teaching and learning for TK • Schedule: Daily TK/K schedule lacks critical understanding of early learner developmental needs • For example, TK and kindergarten students are expected to sit quietly for 195 minutes (3 hours and 15 minutes) For students with disabilities the petition is not reasonably comprehensive in: • Referral and assessment • Service delivery • Teacher training • Procedural safeguards • Student discipline • Service delivery: o The petition is silent on the role of Specialized Academic Instruction (SAI) by certificated special education staff o The petition does not clearly address "pull-out" SAI services, and does not provide for a separate SDC classroom English Learner Education The Petition fails to adequately describe Designated and Integrated English Language Development ("ELD") instructional services, progress monitoring, or staff training. Designated and Integrated English Language Development The Petition provides only one sentence: Teachers will provide targeted language instruction at the student's level during literacy blocks. Socioeconomically disadvantaged students, homeless students, foster youth: the petition provides general terms for Multi-Tiered System of Supports (MTSS). There was no description of specific delivery for these vulnerable student populations. The Petition states targeted recruitment to SED students; yet: • No specific supports • No specific interventions • No targeted approaches • No description of fiscal and human resources Governance Structure Deficiencies There was no emphasis on parental and community involvement. Although it's not a legal requirement, failure to provide for parent or community representation raises doubts as to whether the Petition is tailored to the interests of the community. Health and Safety Deficiencies There is no reasonably comprehensive description of the Charter School's health and safety procedures. Therefore, our staff was unable to comment on it. Admission Policies and Procedures Deficiencies The enrollment preference granted to "Children of Founding Families," is problematic with regards to district staff. Requiring parents or guardians to volunteer as a condition of admission, enrollment, continued enrollment, attendance, participation in educational activities or receipt of credit or privileges related to educational activities is prohibited per Ed Code. Founding families are defined in the Petition as founding families must contribute significant personal time and founding efforts, including but not limited to holding events with other parents, collecting petition signatures, and disseminating fliers. Founding families are a big part of marketing the charter, proposed charter school, and recruiting future students. Although the petition states that there shall be no requirements that the founding families contribute funds or a specific number of hours as part of their commitment, the petition does not actually describe how this fact will be communicated in a way that seems fair and transparent. Annual Financial Audits Deficiencies There is a failure to specify that the Charter School will follow all of the requirements of the California Nonprofit Integrity Act of 2004, which are considered to be best practices according to California Fiscal Crisis and Management Assistance Team. Dispute Resolution Process Deficiencies Dispute resolution procedure is overly burdensome and restrictive to District staff in addressing issues as part of oversight responsibility. Closure Procedures Deficiencies No reasonably comprehensive description of procedures to be used if the Charter School closes were found in the petition. Does not designate an entity or individual who is responsible for closure related activities. In conclusion, based on the major findings described in the staff report and this presentation, District staff recommends that the Board deny this petition.

Link to this item

Speaker

Dr. Sonal Patel

Rationale

Dr. Sonal Patel, Assistant Superintendent of Educational Services, will provide a presentation pertaining to grading practices within the SLTA-SLUSD MOU which will be utilized during the COVID 19 school closure.

Minutes

Dr. Sonal Patel, Assistant Superintendent of Educational Services, provided a presentation and overview explaining how San Leandro Unified School District (SLUSD) teachers will conduct grading during the emergency distance learning due to the chool closures related to COVID-19. Dr. Patel began by thanking the San Leandro Teachers Association, our teachers, administrators and staff for really working together to put students first during the school closure and develop a grading MOU which the board will take action on later in this board meeting. The MOU aligns with our board policy and speaks to our values around equity and putting students first. Background pertaining the MOU was briefly mentioned. It stated that stress related to COVID-19 will negatively impact student academic performance. Additionally, student academic performance during this time is more likely to reflect racialized economic and resource factors. Alongside this, teachers and students are being asked to engage in emergency distance learning without formal preparation of carefully tailored instruction that would allow for optimal, accurate assessment. Dr. Patel emphasized that our students wellbeing and safety comes before grades. Elementary Schools: For elementary schools, grades TK-5, there will not be a traditional 3rd trimester report card. • Classroom teachers will provide progress feedback on the SLUSD "comments only" report form • Classroom teachers will conduct an individual virtual check-in (via phone or video) at the end of the year to share comments with each student's guardian, as possible • Those conferences will take place between May 26 and June 4 o During those two weeks, elementary school classroom teachers will not be required to submit new lesson plans or lead new virtual classroom activities o Translation services will be scheduled and provided by SLUSD • Elementary School Specialists will not be required to provide grades The elementary "comments only" report for which will be a simple form which will read like a narrative. The Educational Services Division will be working to make it as accessible for folks as possible and share it well before the end of the trimester. Directions will be provided for how to submit/share the form with parents/guardians and ensure accessibility via translation. The individual virtual check-in will be important. As the district wraps up the school year, it will be important for teachers to have a meaningful, one on one conversation with their student's parent(s)/guardian(s) about their goals, progress, and next steps as they transition into summer. Teachers can use phone or video conferencing for this conversation during the last 8 days of school, as referenced in the MOU. Elementary principals will support their staff in creating schedules that ensure coordination of interpretation services provided by SLUSD. Middle Schools, Grades 6-8 • Students will receive a Pass/Incomplete grade for the 4th quarter • If incomplete work is not made up within 6 weeks of school reopening, the Incomplete shall become a No Pass Some school districts in other counties are implementing pass/no pass or credit/no credit. Our school district believes that students should not receive a no pass/no credit for not being able to turn in work during the 4th quarter. The stress related to COVID-19 create a very difficult context for students to learn in. Therefore, if students are able to complete their work, they will receive a Pass; if not, rather than the 3rd quarter work counting for their current grade, which may not provide a student an opportunity to rise, nor might be enough motivation for students to participate in the 4th quarter, those students will receive an incomplete. High School, Grades 9-12 • Students will receive a Pass/Incomplete grade for the 4th quarter/2nd semester • The 3rd quarter grade will be converted in Pass/No Pass in order to factor into 2nd semester grade • If incomplete work is not made up within 6 weeks of school reopening, the Incomplete shall become a No Pass Dr. Patel explained why SLUSD is offering "Incomplete" instead of "No Pass". "No Pass" connotes a final evaluation of a student's performance. During school closures, where students may not be able to show us their work or participate, this is not an accurate evaluation of the student's work. A "No Pass" disadvantages students who may be experiencing stress and unforeseen challenges due to COVID-19 and do not have the ability to turn in work. Therefore, a "Pass/Incomplete" is a more accurate grade and allows students, regardless of circumstances, to complete course requirements when they have the opportunity. Our counselors, teachers and administrators are well prepared to take a roster of the students who receive incompletes and provide quality outreach and ensure that they have time to complete the work before school reopens and even when school reopens providing direct support as needed after school and online to enable students to complete the work. What happens after an "Incomplete"? Students who receive an "Incomplete" at the end of the year will have the opportunity within 6 weeks of schools reopening, to submit their work in order to convert the "Incomplete" to a "Pass". If students do not submit their work after 6 weeks, they will receive a "No Pass". Special Consideration for Seniors The high school administrators and counselors will work with Seniors who receive Incompletes on a case by case basis to determine graduation eligibility and mitigate factors related to COVID-19 school closure. This work is highly dependent on receiving a graduation requirement waiver for some courses from California Department of Education. Our staff will work on this waiver in the coming weeks in collaboration with San Leandro Teachers Association (SLTA). It is in the best interest of all seniors to stay as up to date as possible in their coursework. High School: How will this affect my GPA? The 2nd semester grades will not be factored in students’ overall GPA. A link was provided to view the guidance from UC/CSU to learn how this affects college-going seniors and future applicants. Advanced Placement Grade Weighting Students in AP courses may have received an extra weight in the GPA for the first semester of 2019-2020. As all courses will be graded Pass/No Pass for the 2nd semester, it looks like AP courses will not be weighted in the second semester. We are in continual contact with The College Board and will provide updates if SLUSD receives further guidance. AP students are highly encouraged to take AP exams. Dr. Patel encouraged families to work their high school administrators and counselors to support testing conditions for all students enrolled in AP courses. Feedback and Support While this presentation was about grading, all kinds of feedback is still very important. The school community comments and insights on students' non-graded work matters as well as "face-to-face" check ins. Teachers have been reminded that supportive feedback in various forms helps to focus students on practical next steps for learning and lets them know you care. As student wellbeing and engaged connectivity to school is SLUSD's primary goal, the staff is supportive of teachers ensuring that emergency distance learning plan are aligned with this purpose. Teachers have been offered support as needed by our instructional coach team.

Link to this item

Minutes

Trustee Rodriguez read all correspondence received since the last board meeting.

Link to this item

Minutes

Student board member Deanna Gaines provided a report as follows: During the shelter-in-place mandate, high school students have participated in an online spirit week. This involved the students dressing up in their pajamas, reading books, and various activities to keep the students active. Ms. Gaines has spoken to many senior classmates, who have questions concerning graduation, prom and other senior end of year activities. Online officer positions and ballots are taking place at the high school for ASB president, vice president, secretary and treasurer position for next school year.

Link to this item

Minutes

Thomas Morse, President, San Leandro Teachers Association (SLTA), provided the following report: It has been great working with the administration to get through this difficult time with our staff and teachers; coming to the table to get 3 different MOUs in place, which was made easy by district administration. He wanted to provide a shout-out to the Educational Services staff, who provided an extraordinary staff development series to help us all talk about and think about distance teaching. It provided good dialog about strategy. Another shout out went to the Tech Department for their assistance with the over 3,000 chromebooks being distributed to students. Also, Food Services, whose staff is making it easier for families to get through this. In closing, he expressed gratitude for all the work done collectively and expressed pride for all the teachers he's working with, along with the CSEA and Teamster unions. Lastly, he acknowledged and thanked the students, who are looking for connections and classmates. It's a real testament to the spirit that's in our community.

Link to this item

Rationale

Review District approved contracts for amounts $10,000 or less for the current fiscal year.

Attachments

• Contracts under 10K 4.14.2020 PDF · 69.6 KB ViewOpen Contracts under 10K 4.14.2020Download Contracts under 10K 4.14.2020

Link to this item

Rationale

Review board meeting minutes from March 10, 2020.

Minutes

Approve minutes from March 10, 2020 board meeting.

Attachments

• March 10, 2020 PDF · 107.3 KB ViewOpen March 10, 2020Download March 10, 2020

Link to this item

Rationale

When district-owned books, equipment and supplies become unusable, obsolete, or no longer needed, the Superintendent or designee shall identify these items to the Governing Board, together with their estimated value and a recommendation that they be sold or disposed of by one of the methods prescribe in law and administrative regulations. With Board approval, the Superintendent or designee shall arrange for the sale or disposal of these items. Please see attached. Board Policy 3270(a); Administrative Regulations 3270 (a).

Attachments

• Discarded Electronics - Adult School 4.14.2020 PDF · 61.2 KB ViewOpen Discarded Electronics - Adult School 4.14.2020Download Discarded Electronics - Adult School 4.14.2020

Link to this item

Attachments

• April 2020 Personnel Report PDF · 47.2 KB ViewOpen April 2020 Personnel ReportDownload April 2020 Personnel Report

Link to this item

Rationale

SchoolMint allows us to build a custom online enrollment solution that will streamline the enrollment process and allow documents to be submitted online. The contract includes translation services for up to four languages, email and text communications with prospective families and reporting so that we can keep the business office better informed of our enrollment projections for the coming year. SchoolMint will work on web browsers and mobile phones. Additionally, it allows for better communications and Community and Public Relations.

Financial Impact

$40,922.93 Supplemental and Concentration Funds.

Attachments

• SchoolMint Renewal Contract PDF · 929.0 KB ViewOpen SchoolMint Renewal ContractDownload SchoolMint Renewal Contract

Link to this item

Rationale

Staff are looking to procure a new phone system for use in the district. Existing Cisco system is highly functional but costly on an annual basis to maintain and difficult to maintain from a technical perspective. In light of this staff is looking to switch to a different system that can leverage existing district investments in server and network infrastructure and which is expected to bring annual general fund savings in excess of $100,000. This item is requesting funding the phone service for the new system. This is a switch from our AT&T analog lines to a purely IP based service and is expected to bring annual savings in excess of $40,000.

Financial Impact

Fiscal impact $19,070.40 annually from General Fund

Attachments

• New Phone Service PDF · 131.0 KB ViewOpen New Phone ServiceDownload New Phone Service

Link to this item

Rationale

Staff are looking to procure a new phone system for use in the district. Existing Cisco system is highly functional but costly on an annual basis to maintain and difficult to maintain from a technical perspective. In light of this staff is looking to switch to a different system that can leverage existing district investments in server and network infrastructure and which is expected to bring annual general fund savings in excess of $100,000. This item is requesting funding for handsets compatible with the new system. These phones are not locked to this system and should be compatible with any open standards voice system if the district chooses to make a change again in the future.

Financial Impact

Fiscal impact $94,878.88 from Measure J1 (Technology)

Attachments

• New Phone Handsets PDF · 89.1 KB ViewOpen New Phone HandsetsDownload New Phone Handsets

Link to this item

Rationale

Staff are looking to procure a new phone system for use in the district. Existing Cisco system is highly functional but costly on an annual basis to maintain and difficult to maintain from a technical perspective. In light of this staff is looking to switch to a different system that can leverage existing district investments in server and network infrastructure and which is expected to bring annual general fund savings in excess of $100,000. This item is requesting funding for the software for the system itself including 5 years of support.

Financial Impact

Fiscal impact $72,500.00 from Measure J1 (Technology)

Attachments

• New Phone System PDF · 86.1 KB ViewOpen New Phone SystemDownload New Phone System

Link to this item

Rationale

SLUSD has approximately $832,134 of E-Rate Category 2 federal funding available for Wireless hardware and related equipment. This means that if we procure equipment and services up to that dollar amount the federal government will provide 80% of the funding. This funding resets after this year and any unused funding will no longer be available. To that end the SLUSD Technology department has solicited proposals to upgrade school wireless hardware and related services. Staff has obtained pricing to install upgraded network switch, cabinet and UPS battery backups for the network cabinets at all school sites. Staff recommends awarding the project to AMS.net based on the scoring criteria in the attached sheet.

Financial Impact

Fiscal impact $97,956.38 from Measure J1 (Technology)

Attachments

• E-Rate Year 23 Category 2 Racks UPS and Switches item PDF · 28.2 MB ViewOpen E-Rate Year 23 Category 2 Racks UPS and Switches itemDownload E-Rate Year 23 Category 2 Racks UPS and Switches item

Link to this item

Rationale

IES has completed the Line-Set Covers project at FTK and we are required to file the Notice of Completion with the County.

Financial Impact

No fiscal impact

Attachments

• IES-NOC FTK Linset Covers PDF · 63.3 KB ViewOpen IES-NOC FTK Linset CoversDownload IES-NOC FTK Linset Covers

Link to this item

Rationale

RA Jones Construction has completed the demolition of the District Warehouse walk in freezer, and we will need to file the Notice of Completion with the County.

Financial Impact

No fiscal impact

Attachments

• RA Jones NOC - Warehouse walk in freezer demo PDF · 62.4 KB ViewOpen RA Jones NOC - Warehouse walk in freezer demoDownload RA Jones NOC - Warehouse walk in freezer demo

Link to this item

Rationale

The Fixall Co. has completed the Washington ES ADA Parking Stalls project, and we will need to file the Notice of Completion with the County.

Financial Impact

No fiscal impact

Attachments

• Fixall Co. NOC - Washington ADA Parking Stalls PDF · 62.4 KB ViewOpen Fixall Co. NOC - Washington ADA Parking StallsDownload Fixall Co. NOC - Washington ADA Parking Stalls

Link to this item

Rationale

Rock Solid Inc. has completed the SLHS Pool Deck project, we are required to file the Notice of Completion with the County.

Financial Impact

No fiscal impact

Attachments

• Rock Solid Inc. NOC - SLHS Pool Deck Repair PDF · 62.4 KB ViewOpen Rock Solid Inc. NOC - SLHS Pool Deck RepairDownload Rock Solid Inc. NOC - SLHS Pool Deck Repair

Link to this item

Rationale

Beals Martin Construction completed the District Warehouse Nutrition Center project, and we will need to file the Notice of Completion with the County.

Financial Impact

No fiscal impact

Attachments

• Beals Martin NOC-District Warehouse Nutrition Center PDF · 63.3 KB ViewOpen Beals Martin NOC-District Warehouse Nutrition CenterDownload Beals Martin NOC-District Warehouse Nutrition Center

Link to this item

Rationale

Bailey Fence has completed the Monroe ES garden fence area, and the Notice of Completion is required to be filed at the County.

Financial Impact

No fiscal impact

Attachments

• Bailey Fence NOC - Monroe garden fence PDF · 63.4 KB ViewOpen Bailey Fence NOC - Monroe garden fenceDownload Bailey Fence NOC - Monroe garden fence

Link to this item

Rationale

Anaya Construction has completed the Roosevelt Portable Dismantle project, the Notice of Completion required to be filed with the County.

Financial Impact

No fiscal impact

Attachments

• Anaya NOC-Roosevelt Portable Dismantle PDF · 13.1 KB ViewOpen Anaya NOC-Roosevelt Portable DismantleDownload Anaya NOC-Roosevelt Portable Dismantle

Link to this item

Rationale

Locations were just approved to install the new ice machines we recently purchased. Both locations are not close to a water or power source. This quote includes running power and water lines to those locations.

Financial Impact

Fiscal impact $18,433 From Measure J1 Funds (Plumbing/Backflows)

Attachments

• Bosco CUPCCAA-Muir and Bancroft Ice Machines PDF · 272.2 KB ViewOpen Bosco CUPCCAA-Muir and Bancroft Ice MachinesDownload Bosco CUPCCAA-Muir and Bancroft Ice Machines

Link to this item

Rationale

The original quote for the new portables destined for the Adult School did not include sinks in each of the classrooms. This was requested by the site administrator. Change Order is to add a 4' base cabinet with a sink and a bubbler to to each of the new incoming 5 portables

Financial Impact

Fiscal impact $15,625.85 from Adult Ed Funds

Attachments

• Mobile Modular Change Order-Adult Ed Portables PDF · 79.3 KB ViewOpen Mobile Modular Change Order-Adult Ed PortablesDownload Mobile Modular Change Order-Adult Ed Portables

Link to this item

Rationale

Invoices from Geo-Engineering for the construction phase engineering services on the multi-site elementary modular buildings

Financial Impact

Total Fiscal impact $41,257 from Measure J1 Funds (Portable Replacement) Above total is inclusive of $3,750 for Wilson ES $694 for Washington ES $20,656 for McKinley ES $9,767 for Jefferson ES $6,390 for Garfield ES

Attachments

• Geo-Engineering Invoices - ES Modular engineering services PDF · 1.5 MB ViewOpen Geo-Engineering Invoices - ES Modular engineering servicesDownload Geo-Engineering Invoices - ES Modular engineering services

Link to this item

Rationale

The current fire alarm panel at Washington ES is failing and is no longer supported by the manufacturer. It's functioning for the moment but it could completely fail at any moment. We would like to move forward with the replacement before this happens.

Financial Impact

Fiscal impact $13,250 from Measure J1 Funds (Security)

Attachments

• Sound & Signal PO Contract Washington Fire Alarm Panel Upgrade PDF · 214.4 KB ViewOpen Sound & Signal PO Contract Washington Fire Alarm Panel UpgradeDownload Sound & Signal PO Contract Washington Fire Alarm Panel Upgrade

Link to this item

Rationale

D&D Pipelines proposal is to install a 3" backflow on the existing irrigation line at Muir MS

Financial Impact

Fiscal impact $14,952 from Measure J1 Funds (Plumbing/Backflow)

Attachments

• D&D Pipelines PO Contract - Muir Backflow PDF · 134.0 KB ViewOpen D&D Pipelines PO Contract - Muir BackflowDownload D&D Pipelines PO Contract - Muir Backflow

Link to this item

Rationale

R&H Wholesale invoices are for the re-keying of locksets for the Elementary School Modular buildings to match the district locks

Financial Impact

Total Fiscal impact $13,268.05 from Measure J1 Funds (Portable Replacement) Above Fiscal impact is inclusive of $4,156.02 for Madison ES $362.18 for McKinley ES $2,439.46 for Wilson ES $6,310.39 for Garfield ES

Attachments

• R&H Wholesale Invoices-ES Modular Locksets PDF · 2.2 MB ViewOpen R&H Wholesale Invoices-ES Modular LocksetsDownload R&H Wholesale Invoices-ES Modular Locksets

Link to this item

Rationale

Mobile Modular proposal is to continue renting the portable buildings at Wilson ES for interim housing for another 12 months

Financial Impact

Fiscal impact $75,600 from Measure J1 Funds (Portable Replacement)

Attachments

• Mobile Modular proposal-Wilson ES interim housing portables PDF · 403.5 KB ViewOpen Mobile Modular proposal-Wilson ES interim housing portablesDownload Mobile Modular proposal-Wilson ES interim housing portables

Link to this item

Rationale

This proposal from KI is to purchase all new furniture for the new Modular classrooms.

Financial Impact

Fiscal impact $115,489.62 + 11548.97 (10% contingency) total 127,038.59 From Measure J1 Funds (Portable Replacement)

Attachments

• KI Furniture proposal-Roosevelt ES Modular Funiture PDF · 1.0 MB ViewOpen KI Furniture proposal-Roosevelt ES Modular FunitureDownload KI Furniture proposal-Roosevelt ES Modular Funiture

Link to this item

Rationale

Bosco Construction will install ice machines in the PE department at Muir and Bancroft MS to have ice readily available in case of injuries.

Financial Impact

Fiscal impact $18,433 from Measure J1 Funds (Plumbing/Backflow)

Attachments

• Bosco CUPCCAA-Muir and Bancroft Ice Machines PDF · 324.4 KB ViewOpen Bosco CUPCCAA-Muir and Bancroft Ice MachinesDownload Bosco CUPCCAA-Muir and Bancroft Ice Machines

Link to this item

Rationale

Mobile Modular Change Order is to add a 4' base cabinet with a sink and a bubbler to each of the new incoming 5 portables. The site administrated requested that sinks be added to the portable buildings.

Financial Impact

Fiscal impact $15,625.85 from Adult Ed Funds

Attachments

• Mobile Modular Change Order-Adult Ed Portables PDF · 154.6 KB ViewOpen Mobile Modular Change Order-Adult Ed PortablesDownload Mobile Modular Change Order-Adult Ed Portables

Link to this item

Rationale

In light of the recent water damage at the FTK campus it was decided to do a district wide evaluation of any custodial closet that may be lacking a floor drain. This is a safeguard to help prevent any similar incidents from happening. This proposal to install 6 floor drains in the custodial closets at San Leandro High School and Bancroft Middle School.

Financial Impact

Fiscal impact $26,811 from Measure J1 Funds (Plumbing/Backflow)

Attachments

• Bosco CUPCCAA-SLHS Custodial Closet Floor Drains PDF · 323.3 KB ViewOpen Bosco CUPCCAA-SLHS Custodial Closet Floor DrainsDownload Bosco CUPCCAA-SLHS Custodial Closet Floor Drains

Link to this item

Rationale

This proposal is to add a zoning controller kit to separate the controls between the Food Service Office and Kitchen area. Also to add an additional thermostat in the kitchen area. The purpose is to have the kitchen get more air conditioning when in use without freezing the food service staff that are in the adjacent offices.

Financial Impact

Fiscal impact $19,670 from Measure J1 Funds (HVAC)

Attachments

• IES-District Warehouse Nutrition Center - HVAC PDF · 661.7 KB ViewOpen IES-District Warehouse Nutrition Center - HVACDownload IES-District Warehouse Nutrition Center - HVAC

Link to this item

Rationale

Jim Freethy Excavating, Inc. will provide material and labor to Clean Up the San Leandro Adult Ed Grounds, including fence removal, supply and install trenches and removal of debris.

Financial Impact

Fiscal impact $33,548 from Adult Ed Funds

Attachments

• Jim Freethy CUPCCAA-Adult ED Site Maintenance and Clean Up PDF · 415.4 KB ViewOpen Jim Freethy CUPCCAA-Adult ED Site Maintenance and Clean UpDownload Jim Freethy CUPCCAA-Adult ED Site Maintenance and Clean Up

Link to this item

Rationale

The Education Code requires that when a bond measure is successful, the Board adopt a resolution confirming its success. The District has received official results from the County confirming the success of Measure N. This Resolution satisfies the requirements of the Education Code regarding entering success in District Board minutes by Resolution.

Actions

Motion Recommend to approve Resolution No. 20-22 Certifying to the Board of Supervisors of Alameda County All Proceedings in the March 3, 2020 General Obligation Bond Election. Passed with a motion by Evelyn Gonzalez and a second by Monique Tate. | Vote: Yes James Aguilar .; Yes Student Board Member .; Yes Evelyn Gonzalez .; Yes Peter Oshinski .; Yes Diana Prola .; Yes Christian Rodriguez .; Yes Leo Sheridan .; Yes Monique Tate .

Financial Impact

There is no direct impact in approving Resolution No. 20-22.

Attachments

• Resolution 20-22 Certification of Measure N PDF · 189.5 KB ViewOpen Resolution 20-22 Certification of Measure NDownload Resolution 20-22 Certification of Measure N

Link to this item

Rationale

Measure N was successful at the March 3, 2020 election. Like Measure J1, it requires citizens oversight for transparency in bond money spending. This Resolution appoints the J1 Committee to also oversee Measure N expenditures, and makes technical amendments to the Measure J1 Bylaws to include Measure N oversight.

Actions

Motion Recommend approval of Resolution No. 20-23 adopting amended bylaws for the district Citizens' Bond Oversight Committee. Passed with a motion by Diana Prola and a second by James Aguilar. | Vote: Yes James Aguilar .; Yes Student Board Member .; Yes Evelyn Gonzalez .; Yes Peter Oshinski .; Yes Diana Prola .; Yes Christian Rodriguez .; Yes Leo Sheridan .; Yes Monique Tate .

Financial Impact

There is no direct fiscal impact in approving Resolution No. 20-23.

Attachments

• Amended CBOC Bylaws (Measures J1 and N) PDF · 69.9 KB ViewOpen Amended CBOC Bylaws (Measures J1 and N)Download Amended CBOC Bylaws (Measures J1 and N)
• Amended CBOC Bylaws (Redline Version) PDF · 127.3 KB ViewOpen Amended CBOC Bylaws (Redline Version)Download Amended CBOC Bylaws (Redline Version)
• Resolution 20-23 CBOC Amended Bylaws PDF · 69.9 KB ViewOpen Resolution 20-23 CBOC Amended BylawsDownload Resolution 20-23 CBOC Amended Bylaws

Link to this item

Rationale

New Money Issuances – J1 and N . Measure J1 was successful at the November 8, 2016 Bond Election, authorizing the District to issue up to $104 million in GO Bonds to finance voter-approved school facility projects. The District currently has $3,250,000 of authorized but unissued bonds under Measure J1. The Resolution authorizes the issuance of a final series of Measure J1 Bonds for technology projects. The District was also successful with Measure N at the March 3, 2020 election which authorizes up to $198 million in GO Bonds. The Resolution authorizes a first series of Measure N Bonds in the amount of $75,000,000 for Measure N facilities projects. The Bonds are repaid by the levy and collection of voter-approved property taxes. The Bonds will be all current interest bonds (no capital appreciation bonds), with maturities and interest rates within all applicable legal limitations. The Resolution appoints the investment banking firm of Piper Sandler to underwrite the Bonds. Appendix B of the Resolution summarizes certain current expectations about the financing, in accordance with Senate Bill 450. The Resolution authorizes staff to work with the financing team to complete all related documentation (Preliminary Official Statement and Bond Purchase Agreement) to accomplish the financing. The current timeline calls for both series to receive pricing on May 11. However, economic uncertainties due to the COVID-19 pandemic have impacted the bond market and has caused volatility. The district and its financial advisor will be closely monitoring the bond market and may recommend a smaller issuance or postponement depending on conditions in May. The following items are presented here: Resolution 20-24 calling for bond issuances Bond issuance Timeline Bond Purchase Agreement (BPA - blanks to be filled in at later date) Preliminary Offer of Sale (POS - blanks to be filled in at later date) Also attached is a slide showing the impact of this resolution combined with the refunding authorization represented with Resolution No. 20-25. The total amounts are based on estimated interest rates as of early April. It is believed that interest rates will both decrease and stabilize by the pricing date in May.

Actions

Motion Approve Resolution No. 20-24 Passed with a motion by Monique Tate and a second by Leo Sheridan. | Vote: Yes James Aguilar .; Yes Student Board Member .; Yes Evelyn Gonzalez .; Yes Peter Oshinski .; Yes Diana Prola .; Yes Christian Rodriguez .; Yes Leo Sheridan .; Yes Monique Tate .

Financial Impact

Approval of this resolution will allow the district to sell up to $75,000,000 in Measure N funds, and $3,250,000 in Measure J1 funds.

Attachments

• 1 - Resolution 20-24 J1 Series D, N Series A PDF · 231.3 KB ViewOpen 1 - Resolution 20-24 J1 Series D, N Series ADownload 1 - Resolution 20-24 J1 Series D, N Series A
• 2 - Bond Issuance Timeline PDF · 60.0 KB ViewOpen 2 - Bond Issuance TimelineDownload 2 - Bond Issuance Timeline
• 3 - Bond Purchase Agreement - J1 Series D and N Series A PDF · 183.6 KB ViewOpen 3 - Bond Purchase Agreement - J1 Series D and N Series ADownload 3 - Bond Purchase Agreement - J1 Series D and N Series A
• 4 - Preliminary Offer of Sale Measure J1 Series D, Measure N Series A PDF · 921.0 KB ViewOpen 4 - Preliminary Offer of Sale Measure J1 Series D, Measure N Series ADownload 4 - Preliminary Offer of Sale Measure J1 Series D, Measure N Series A
• 5 - Bond Summary PDF · 89.0 KB ViewOpen 5 - Bond SummaryDownload 5 - Bond Summary

Link to this item

Rationale

Refunding Bonds – 2010A Bonds . The District has been informed that it may be able to capture interest rate savings and pass on the savings to District taxpayers by refinancing its outstanding Election of 2010, Series A Bonds. Because the redemption date is not until August 1, 2021, the Refunding Bonds are proposed to be sold on a forward delivery basis. Piper Sandler is the Underwriter. Appendix B of the Resolution summarizes certain current expectations about the financing, in accordance with Senate Bill 450. The Resolution authorizes staff to work with the financing team to complete all related documentation (Preliminary Official Statement and Bond Purchase Agreement) to accomplish the financing. Attachments: Resolution 20-25 Draft Bond Purchase Agreement (Forward - Blanks to be filled in later) Draft Preliminary Official Statement (Blanks to be filled in later)

Actions

Motion Approve Resolution 20-25 authorizing forward refunding of outstanding bonds from Election of 2010 Series A Passed with a motion by Evelyn Gonzalez and a second by Monique Tate. | Vote: Yes James Aguilar .; Yes Student Board Member .; Yes Evelyn Gonzalez .; Yes Peter Oshinski .; Yes Diana Prola .; Yes Christian Rodriguez .; Yes Leo Sheridan .; Yes Monique Tate .

Financial Impact

There is no direct fiscal impact to the district in approving Resolution No. 20-25, however the resolution will save taxpayers approximately $9,467,000.

Attachments

• 1 - Resolution 20-25 Forward Refunding 2010 Series A PDF · 225.3 KB ViewOpen 1 - Resolution 20-25 Forward Refunding 2010 Series ADownload 1 - Resolution 20-25 Forward Refunding 2010 Series A
• 2 - Bond Purchase Agreement PDF · 208.0 KB ViewOpen 2 - Bond Purchase AgreementDownload 2 - Bond Purchase Agreement
• 3 - Preliminary Offer of Sale PDF · 535.0 KB ViewOpen 3 - Preliminary Offer of SaleDownload 3 - Preliminary Offer of Sale

Link to this item

Rationale

The continuation of the Measure J1 projects is an important priority for the San Leandro Unified School District. To ensure compliance with the April 1,2020 order from the County of Alameda; staff recommends that the Governing Board approve Resolution No. 20-26. The compelling reasons to approve this resolution include but are not limited to the following: Timely completion of the projects is required to ensure continued operations, including the provision of the District's educational program with adequate space and facilities, without impact to students; and Timely completion of the project is required of the District's educational programs in safe, accessible, and structurally sound facilities, and to support student health and safety; and Timely completion of the project is required to ensure that the District is able to remain within its budget for the project and avoid increased costs to the public. Approval of this resolution will supercede the original notice declaring essential services signed by the Superintendent on April 1.

Actions

Motion Approve Resolution No. 20-26. Passed with a motion by James Aguilar and a second by Leo Sheridan. | Vote: Yes James Aguilar .; Yes Student Board Member .; Yes Evelyn Gonzalez .; Yes Peter Oshinski .; Yes Diana Prola .; Yes Christian Rodriguez .; Yes Leo Sheridan .; Yes Monique Tate .

Financial Impact

Approval of Resolution No. 20-26 will allow previously approved projects to continue according to established terms and contracts with contractors. This will allow the District to avoid potentially major costs associated with shutting projects for weeks or months.

Attachments

• Resolution 20-26 Designating Public Works Projects as Essential PDF · 775.7 KB ViewOpen Resolution 20-26 Designating Public Works Projects as EssentialDownload Resolution 20-26 Designating Public Works Projects as Essential

Link to this item

Actions

Motion Passed with a motion by Evelyn Gonzalez and a second by James Aguilar. | Vote: Yes James Aguilar .; Yes Student Board Member .; Yes Evelyn Gonzalez .; Yes Peter Oshinski .; Yes Diana Prola .; Yes Christian Rodriguez .; Yes Leo Sheridan .; Yes Monique Tate .

Link to this item

Rationale

This MOU outlines the agreed grading practices which will be utilized during the COVID 19 school closure.

Actions

Motion Approve the the Grading During COVID 19 School Closure MOU. Passed with a motion by Leo Sheridan and a second by Evelyn Gonzalez. | Vote: Yes James Aguilar .; Yes Student Board Member .; Yes Evelyn Gonzalez .; Yes Peter Oshinski .; Yes Diana Prola .; Yes Christian Rodriguez .; Yes Leo Sheridan .; Yes Monique Tate .

Attachments

• MOU Grading During COVID 19 School Closure PDF · 1.8 MB ViewOpen MOU Grading During COVID 19 School ClosureDownload MOU Grading During COVID 19 School Closure

Link to this item

Rationale

BACKGROUND: On February 3, 2020 the Board formally received a petition for the establishment of San Leandro Catalyst Collegiate Charter School, which commenced a review process pursuant to the legal requirements of the Charter Schools Act. On March 10, 2020, a public hearing was held, providing an opportunity for members of the community to speak about their interest in a charter school in our district. Charter petitions must meet a lengthy list of legal criteria laid out in the Education Code, including everything from the educational program, to school governance, budget, special education and beyond. San Leandro Unified School District convened a staff review team to review the petition and to critically evaluate whether the program proposed by the petitioners met legal requirements and offered a sustainable program to local students.

Minutes

President Oshinski recited protocols for public comments pertaining to this agenda item. He read all emails received from the public comments email provided on the district website. The following emails were in support of San Leandro Catalyst Collegiate Charter School: Aron Michalski - an attachment was submitted to this email and shared with board members Ronda Franklin-Sanchez Angela Kimble Britany Ruiz Ruben Canas and Cony Ruiz Esperiza Carmela Kimble Pooyeh Banifazi Amani Washington Lila Neupane Caroline Hassan Georjinia Licea Alma Reyes Patricia Garcia Nancy Manzo Alejandra Gonzalez Raquel Alexander Claudia Estrada Maria Torres - emailed on behalf of Paula Lozano, who does not have email Monica and Jesus Ferrel Josephine Adutwumwaa An email was sent from Valdivia Rocio in support of the bilingual program at Jefferson Elementary School. The audio stated Angela-Zuluaga -Adkisson, who translated the email. An email with a letter attached was submitted by Bob Glotch, Executive Director of the Boys and Girls Club. He wrote to clarify a recent letter that came out on their letterhead championing a charter school. He stated that letter was unauthorized by him and that situation has been corrected. The letter went on to express the privilege and honor to work side by side with San Leandro Unified School District in helping our students become good citizens and passionate lifelong learners. Rose Padilla Johnson, Chief Executive Officer of Davis Street Community Center, provided a letter clarifying letters received from Ms. Langham and Ms. Jacobs, staff members at Davis Street. The letter from Ms. Padilla Johnson stated that she recently learned the staff members sent letters in late January with respect to San Leandro Catalyst Collegiate Charter School. She stated those letters were not sanctioned by Davis Street agency or her. She asked our superintendent and board president to disregard those letters because they were not reflective of Davis Street's viewpoint on public education and personally believes in the effectiveness of San Leandro Unified School District. After all emails pertaining to the charter petition were read, public comments from the community were addressed. Each person was allowed 2 minutes to speak; their comments are summarized below. The following speakers spoke in favor of the proposed San Leandro Catalyst Collegiate Charter School (SLCC) Petition. They are founding board members and design team staff members and felt that district’s findings are inaccurate, unfounded and/or inconsistent and want to partner with the school district with their proposed charter school: Nicki Fox, Lead Petitioner Dr. Carey Hawkins-Ash Lydia Butterfield Keyur Shah Aaron Brynen Aniya Grimm Rohit Agarwal Courtney McLaughlin Elizabeth Raji-Greig Sharrie Overall Shamara Jackson Ronda Franklin-Sanchez Rohit Agarwal The following speakers spoke in opposition to the San Leandro Catalyst Collegiate Charter School (SLCC) Petition: Thomas Morse, San Leandro Teachers Association (SLTA) President Gaia Pine – SLUSD staff member Lisa McNally - 3rd grade teacher at Garfield Elementary School Natasha Weidner - teacher at Roosevelt Elementary Lydia Oey - former charter school teacher, current SLUSD teacher Jeff Bruno - SLUSD teacher Judith Alcala - Principal of Jefferson Elementary School Rachel England Rufina Lopez called but was unable to connect to the virtual board meeting for public comment. After hearing from all speakers the board voted on this agenda item.

Actions

Motion Staff recommends that the Board of Education deny the charter petition based on findings in staff report. Passed with a motion by Christian Rodriguez and a second by Leo Sheridan. Motion Staff recommends that the Board of Education deny the charter petition based on findings in staff report. Passed with a motion by Christian Rodriguez and a second by Leo Sheridan. | Vote: Yes James Aguilar .; Yes Student Board Member .; Yes Evelyn Gonzalez .; Yes Peter Oshinski .; Yes Diana Prola .; Yes Christian Rodriguez .; Yes Leo Sheridan .; Yes Monique Tate .; Vote:; Yes James Aguilar .; Yes Student Board Member .; Yes Evelyn Gonzalez .; Yes Peter Oshinski .; Yes Diana Prola .; Yes Christian Rodriguez .; Yes Leo Sheridan .; Yes Monique Tate .

Attachments

• SLUSD Staff Report SLCC Petition 4.14.2020 PDF · 733.4 KB ViewOpen SLUSD Staff Report SLCC Petition 4.14.2020Download SLUSD Staff Report SLCC Petition 4.14.2020
• SLUSD Staff Report SLCC Exhibit 1 4.14.2020 PDF · 479.5 KB ViewOpen SLUSD Staff Report SLCC Exhibit 1 4.14.2020Download SLUSD Staff Report SLCC Exhibit 1 4.14.2020

Link to this item

Rationale

This memorandum of understanding is between the San Leandro Unified School District and Building Trades Council of Alameda County for use of the Multi-Craft Core Curriculum (MC3). Memorandum of understanding outlines the terms, training, licensing requirements, and implementation plan for the launch of the pre-apprenticeship course at Lincoln High School starting in the 2020-2021 school year.

Actions

Motion Staff recommends approval of Memorandum of Understanding Between San Leandro Unified School District and Building Trades Council of Alameda County for Use of the Multi-Craft Core Curriculum (MC3). Passed with a motion by Leo Sheridan and a second by Monique Tate. Motion Staff recommends approval of Memorandum of Understanding Between San Leandro Unified School District and Building Trades Council of Alameda County for Use of the Multi-Craft Core Curriculum (MC3). Passed with a motion by Leo Sheridan and a second by Monique Tate. | Vote: Yes James Aguilar .; Yes Student Board Member .; Yes Evelyn Gonzalez .; Yes Peter Oshinski .; Yes Diana Prola .; Yes Christian Rodriguez .; Yes Leo Sheridan .; Yes Monique Tate .; Vote:; Yes James Aguilar .; Yes Student Board Member .; Yes Evelyn Gonzalez .; Yes Peter Oshinski .; Yes Diana Prola .; Yes Christian Rodriguez .; Yes Leo Sheridan .; Yes Monique Tate .

Financial Impact

Strong Workforce Grant: $100 per student who completes MC3 course

Attachments

• MC3 Licensing Agreement PDF · 65.2 KB ViewOpen MC3 Licensing AgreementDownload MC3 Licensing Agreement
• MOU SLUSD and Building Trades Council of Alameda PDF · 85.5 KB ViewOpen MOU SLUSD and Building Trades Council of AlamedaDownload MOU SLUSD and Building Trades Council of Alameda
• NABTU MC3 Implementation Plan for SLUSD PDF · 77.2 KB ViewOpen NABTU MC3 Implementation Plan for SLUSDDownload NABTU MC3 Implementation Plan for SLUSD

Link to this item

Rationale

2019-2020 Non-Public School Contracts Student # DOB Location # 1 01/03/2004 The Phillips Academy-Amended to add Speech # 2 11/02/2010 Seneca Family of Agencies-Amended to add Speech # 3 11/22/2002 Seneca Family of Agencies # 4 06/17/2011 Wellspring Educational Services

Actions

Motion Approved Non-Public School contracts. Passed with a motion by James Aguilar and a second by Evelyn Gonzalez. Motion Approved Non-Public School contracts. Passed with a motion by James Aguilar and a second by Evelyn Gonzalez. | Vote: Yes James Aguilar .; Yes Student Board Member .; Yes Evelyn Gonzalez .; Yes Peter Oshinski .; Yes Diana Prola .; Yes Christian Rodriguez .; Yes Leo Sheridan .; Yes Monique Tate .; Vote:; Yes James Aguilar .; Yes Student Board Member .; Yes Evelyn Gonzalez .; Yes Peter Oshinski .; Yes Diana Prola .; Yes Christian Rodriguez .; Yes Leo Sheridan .; Yes Monique Tate .

Financial Impact

$51,557.80 - Special Ed funds.

Attachments

• Seneca Family of Agencies PDF · 87.5 KB ViewOpen Seneca Family of AgenciesDownload Seneca Family of Agencies
• Seneca Family of Agencies PDF · 436.9 KB ViewOpen Seneca Family of AgenciesDownload Seneca Family of Agencies
• The Phillips Academy PDF · 977.1 KB ViewOpen The Phillips AcademyDownload The Phillips Academy
• Wellspring Educational Services PDF · 1.4 MB ViewOpen Wellspring Educational ServicesDownload Wellspring Educational Services

Link to this item

Rationale

In order to move forward on the Washington ES Modular Building Project JLC is proposing the Gross Maximum Price (GMP) for Increment 1 & 2.

Actions

Motion Recommend approval of the JLC Increment 1 & 2 GMP for Washington ES Modular Building Project. Passed with a motion by Evelyn Gonzalez and a second by James Aguilar. Motion Recommend approval of the JLC Increment 1 & 2 GMP for Washington ES Modular Building Project. Passed with a motion by Evelyn Gonzalez and a second by James Aguilar. | Vote: Yes James Aguilar .; Yes Student Board Member .; Yes Evelyn Gonzalez .; Yes Peter Oshinski .; Yes Diana Prola .; Yes Christian Rodriguez .; Yes Leo Sheridan .; Yes Monique Tate .; Vote:; Yes James Aguilar .; Yes Student Board Member .; Yes Evelyn Gonzalez .; Yes Peter Oshinski .; Yes Diana Prola .; Yes Christian Rodriguez .; Yes Leo Sheridan .; Yes Monique Tate .

Financial Impact

Fiscal impact $5,673,095 from Measure J1 Funds (Portable Replacement)

Attachments

• JLC Increment 1 & 2 GMP for Washington ES Modulars PDF · 370.7 KB ViewOpen JLC Increment 1 & 2 GMP for Washington ES ModularsDownload JLC Increment 1 & 2 GMP for Washington ES Modulars

Link to this item

Rationale

Enrollment as of April 7, 2020

Attachments

• Enrollment as of April 7, 2020 PDF · 199.6 KB ViewOpen Enrollment as of April 7, 2020Download Enrollment as of April 7, 2020

Link to this item

Rationale

The San Leandro Teachers' Association has presented its initial proposal to the District, which is attached to this agenda item, to begin bargaining for reopener negotiations for the 2020-21 school year. The district is presenting this proposal, consistent with Government Code 3547, to provide interested members of the public a chance to review and comment on this proposal prior to the commencement of negotiations.

Attachments

• SLTA to SLUSD Re opener Sunshine 2020 2021 PDF · 26.1 KB ViewOpen SLTA to SLUSD Re opener Sunshine 2020 2021Download SLTA to SLUSD Re opener Sunshine 2020 2021

Link to this item

Rationale

The Teamsters Union Local No.856/Alameda Building Trades Council submitted an initial proposal to reopen contract negotiations with the San Leandro Unified School District (SLUSD). This proposal is presented for public review and comment consistent with the requirements of Government Code 3547.

Attachments

• Teamster Trade Contract Re opener Sunshine for 2020 2021 PDF · 586.2 KB ViewOpen Teamster Trade Contract Re opener Sunshine for 2020 2021Download Teamster Trade Contract Re opener Sunshine for 2020 2021

Link to this item

Rationale

The regulations of the Williams lawsuit settlement require school districts to complete “Quarterly Complaint” reports that document the number of complaints for textbooks and instructional materials, teacher vacancies and mis-assignments, and facilities conditions. Additionally, effective January 2008, as a result of settlement with the California State Department of Education, districts are required to implement the Valenzuela Settlement Legislation (Assembly Bill 347). Notification regarding the complaint process is integrated into the Williams Complaint form which is posted in every secondary classroom as required. For the period of January - March, 2020, the school district did not have any complaints.

Attachments

• UC Qtrly Report Q1 2020 PDF · 305.0 KB ViewOpen UC Qtrly Report Q1 2020Download UC Qtrly Report Q1 2020

Link to this item

Minutes

There were no consensus items presented at this meeting.

Attachments

• Consensus 4.14.2020 PDF · 38.6 KB ViewOpen Consensus 4.14.2020Download Consensus 4.14.2020

Link to this item